Go back
Adieu

Adieu

General


@woofwoof said
Oh my...now we're in serial-killer's-ville.

Divestalker might deny that his list of unresolved conflicts and grievances have been poorly disguised as "recollections"... so now he's made them plain for all to see.
"Serial killer"?


@fmf said
"Serial killer"?
Dive gonna kill ya.

And ghost

And Wolfe

And, and... Aw, Earl of trumps.

But but Suzi, you don't kill the one you love.

Or maybe you do, I'm new to this serial killer business.


-Removed-
What's your point?

Where's all that other stuff you are claiming happened? Where did I say the person was homeless?

As I said, just stop making stuff up.


@suzianne said
As I said, just stop making stuff up.
One of my favourite cases of you completely making stuff up - which you riffed on for a few years, back in the day - was how you had "concrete evidence" that I was a "secret moderator" who had banned "hundreds of subscribers..." "... for disagreeing with" me.


@fmf said
One of my favourite cases of you completely making stuff up - which you riffed on for a few years, back in the day - was how you had "concrete evidence" that I was a "secret moderator" who had banned "hundreds of subscribers..." "... for disagreeing with" me.
Crazy, it was only a couple of dozen.


@a-unique-nickname said
Dive gonna kill ya.

And ghost

And Wolfe

And, and... Aw, Earl of trumps.

But but Suzi, you don't kill the one you love.

Or maybe you do, I'm new to this serial killer business.
😀 Careful man...his "special place" in the basement could be meant just for you.

But seriously, the dude's issues with Suzianne are unnatural.

Reccomendation: Suck it up and move on.

1 edit

1 edit


-Removed-
Looks a bit obsessive compulsive from the outside.


-Removed-
Fun for who? The issue we had with Romans was that he trolled and twisted the personal information people shared for his own amusement.

Do you really want to go down that path?


@the-gravedigger said
Crazy, it was only a couple of dozen.
I'll settle for just "dozens". Saying "a couple of" could be construed as understating it.


@ghost-of-a-duke said
Fun for who? The issue we had with Romans was that he trolled and twisted the personal information people shared for his own amusement.

Do you really want to go down that path?
Romans suggested I was a rapist and a paedophile and he made paedophile jokes about divegeester. You think divegeester is doing something comparable to making allegations of rape and paedophilia?


@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Romans1009 mocked people about their deceased parents and mocked me about my wife nearly dying in 2020. You're really comparing divegeester to Romans1009?


@fmf said
Romans suggested I was a rapist and a paedophile and he made paedophile jokes about divegeester. You think divegeester is doing something comparable to making allegations of rape and paedophilia?
Did I say that?

Romans trolled a whole range of personal info, including my own, purely for his own amusement. If Dive is indeed trolling Suzianne for 'fun' then he is going down the same path.


@fmf said
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Romans1009 mocked people about their deceased parents and mocked me about my wife nearly dying in 2020. You're really comparing divegeester to Romans1009?
Dive has fashioned a (exaggerated) list of personal info/experiences Suzianne has shared purely for the purposes of mocking it for his own amusement. That sounds very much like something Romans would have done and something you would have condemned him for.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.