@FMF
@suzianne said
Your agenda is to reduce public credibility of people who disagree with you, in order to limit the damage to your own credibility, which seems such a tiny pathetic animal at times.
'Tiny pathetic animal' was directly related to your credibility? Can you not follow a simple sentence?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidShe seemed to me to be calling me "a tiny pathetic animal". She has compared me to animsls many times over the years. She's also been describing regular posts as "hate posts".
@FMF
@suzianne said
Your agenda is to reduce public credibility of people who disagree with you, in order to limit the damage to your own credibility, which seems such a tiny pathetic animal at times.
'Tiny pathetic animal' was directly related to your credibility? Can you not follow a simple sentence?
1 edit
@fmf saidYou are miss quoting again but you do seem like a tiny pathetic animal at times. 😛 🙂
She seemed to me to be calling me "a tiny pathetic animal". She has compared me to animsls many times over the years. She's also been describing regular posts as "hate posts".
For a grown man you do whine a lot in my humble opinion.
-VR
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou misunderstand. It's water off a duck's back. The question is whether her banter was a "hate post".
Hang on, I'll get my violin.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIf I aimed animal-related banter at her, would she consider it a "hate post" I wonder.
Nah, I don't buy that. I think Rusty has you pegged.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI only call paranoid posts paranoid. And I only call deluded posts deluded. I think her calling the six posts [on that other thread] "hate posts" is arguably paranoid yes.
You mean instead of the normal 'paranoia' 'delusional' stuff you throw at her?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidShe throws the same stuff at me. It's OK. They are everyday words. They express her opinion accurately. I'm OK with it. When she calls me deluded, for example, I do not think it is a "hate post".
You mean instead of the normal 'paranoia' 'delusional' stuff you throw at her?