Originally posted by Ponderable
The Point was that you wanted a teaching of Jesus, and thus you are bound to look at the boundary conditions of his life. Otherwise you could argue that Jesus approved of atomic bombs, where is his teaching against?
Its quite interesting. I am not sure what it might be but it sounds like a kind of cherry picking and an argument from ignorance. First of all Jesus teachings form an important but comparatively small portion of the entire Bible upon which Christians base their faith. To isolate Jesus teaching and to make a case for something while ignoring the greater body is cherry picking. Secondly stating that something is true because someone never said anything about it or never expressed a contrary opinion about it is a blatant argument from ignorance.
It is clear that Jesus upheld the original standard of the union of male and female, for in response to a question regarding divorce he cites a verse from the book of Genesis, '“Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’ So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.” Matt 19:4-6
Thus logically, Biblically and as you mention historically the case for the acceptance of homosexuality cannot be made on the basis of what Jesus did not say and its ludicrous to think that it can.