2 edits
Originally posted by SilverstrikerWhy is it pointless to point out that just because someone misspelled a word that their posts aren't worthy to be taken seriously. If any of these non English speaking top chess player were to give me advise on chess and they had trouble with a few words. You can bet I would listen. And I sure wouldn't be trying to correct their spelling. Unless there was a word that I truly didn't understand. And then I might just ask them if this is what they meant. The point I feel Huck was trying to make was, would spelling really in that case make their comments useless. I think not. And if Huck was trying to insult anyone he would have to include himself as well. For he is certainly not in the top 30 list either. So the accused insult was not an insult, but instead showing that people should be taken seriously regardless of their spelling ability. And not be nit picked to death. But at the same time. It is good to try their best.
That is pretty mean to say and quite pointless HHH, why didn't you just leave the bracket content out?
Originally posted by cashthetrash*bump*
Why is it pointless to point out that just because someone misspelled a word that their posts aren't worthy to be taken seriously. If any of these non English speaking top chess player were to give me advise on chess and they had trouble with a few words. You can bet I would listen. And I sure wouldn't be trying to correct their spelling. Unless there w ...[text shortened]... ability. And not be nit picked to death. But at the same time. It is good to try their best.
just want to hear the silence i little while longer 🙂
Originally posted by cashthetrashsorry, i might have been a little unclear in my previous post. I can completely understand and fully agree with Huckleberry Hound's arguement. I just couldn't see why it was neccessarily to add the "(better than you part)". It was just those couple of words i didn't see why they were there. But as suggested they maybe have been taken out of context.
Why is it pointless to point out that just because someone misspelled a word that their posts aren't worthy to be taken seriously. If any of these non English speaking top chess player were to give me advise on chess and they had trouble with a few words. You can bet I would listen. And I sure wouldn't be trying to correct their spelling. Unless there w ...[text shortened]... ability. And not be nit picked to death. But at the same time. It is good to try their best.
la la la, maybe i should just stay out of these things sometimes
Originally posted by Silverstrikerfood da bah num key crux wurtem oinx bin posdem di note
sorry, i might have been a little unclear in my previous post. I can completely understand and fully agree with Huckleberry Hound's arguement. I just couldn't see why it was neccessarily to add the "(better than you part)". It was just those couple of words i didn't see why they were there. But as suggested they maybe have been taken out of context.
la la la, maybe i should just stay out of these things sometimes
