Confabulation without using an " - "

Talk about anything. But just don't apply or put to work our Roman script's 5th graphic symbol.

(Our OP subject's 'rubric' and this first post comply).

" say what? "

Originally posted by FMF
Talk about anything. But just don't apply or put to work our Roman script's 5th graphic symbol.

(Our OP subject's 'rubric' and this first post comply).

this is the most incredibly important thread ever begun in any electronic communication system anyhwere and at any time*

* notation: obvious compromises had to be made in order to convey the appropriate scale of this magnitude

Originally posted by coquette
this is the most incredibly important thread ever begun in any electronic communication system anyhwere and at any time*

* notation: obvious compromises had to be made in order to convey the appropriate scale of this magnitude

Madam, you obtain a bonus point for flaunting your disdain for authority and conformity.

This human condition ~ ingrained in us folks from all parts, and with all our variants of living ~ is a miraculous thing for us to honour and applaud with joy and admiration. What do you think?

Originally posted by coquette
this is the most incredibly important thread ever begun in any electronic communication system anyhwere and at any time*

* notation: obvious compromises had to be made in order to convey the appropriate scale of this magnitude

That was profabulous... good job!

Originally posted by FMF
Madam, you obtain a bonus point for flaunting your disdain for authority and conformity.

I do not recognize your authority for handing out bonus points... what are your credentials?

Originally posted by lemon lime
I do not recognize your authority for handing out bonus points... what are your credentials?

It is of no import. Think not of it, lmon lim ~ I trust I am not thought bad for calling you that in our continuing and applicable vocabulary limiting conditions.

A dissimilar and additionally irritating crisis is ongoing...

Not all of your words comply with this word play's strict instructions and goals!

Originally posted by FMF
It is of no import. Think not of it,[b] lmon lim ~ I trust I am not thought bad for calling you that in our continuing and applicable vocabulary limiting conditions.

A dissimilar and additionally irritating crisis is ongoing...

Not all of your words comply with this word play's strict instructions and goals![/b]

Nor do yours sir. 🙂

Originally posted by FMF
Our OP subject's 'rubric' and this first post comply.

That is not so!

This part of our OP's writing (look up from this post) did not accord with our limitation.

Do not apply or put to work our Roman script's 5th graphic symbol!

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Nor do yours sir. 🙂

What you say displays accuracy that I do not - and will not - find conflict with.

Allow that individual who did not slip up to cast a small rock that is thrown prior to that rock and that rock (and so on).

Применио сам ћирилицу, што је исто као да сам само '"-" цртице користио.

Originally posted by vandervelde
Применио сам ћирилицу, што је исто као да сам само '"-" цртице користио.

What a dastardly affront to our implicit nod and a wink vis a vis applying Roman script only!

Originally posted by vandervelde
Применио сам ћирилицу, што је исто као да сам само '"-" цртице користио.

Nice one Cyril.

(A point for knowling the origin of that reference!)