Go back
Cricket world record

Cricket world record

General

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

So we all agreed that it was because of the pitch that Australia lost?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dyl
So we all agreed that it was because of the pitch that Australia lost?
It's because of the pitch that either team got anywhere near 400...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
It's because of the pitch that either team got anywhere near 400...
We would have scored that much regardless. The pitch got S.A. home.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dyl
We would have scored that much regardless. The pitch got S.A. home.
Lol, you keep telling yourself that 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
Lol, you keep telling yourself that 🙂
Bluster on the outside, tears on the in. :'(

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dyl
Bluster on the outside, tears on the in. :'(
Friggin Warnie can be bloody glad he's not playing ODIs anymore...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dyl
Bluster on the outside, tears on the in. :'(
Give us a song, dyl.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I've got a question for those informed in cricket. Where is the sport big and how big is it relative to other sports in those countries. Just curious.

Cheers,
soso

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by 88sOsO
I've got a question for those informed in cricket. Where is the sport big and how big is it relative to other sports in those countries. Just curious.

Cheers,
soso
No 1 in Indian, Pakistan and Sri Lanka where players like Sachin Tendulkar are superstars. Bandladesh too, but they're useless at the moment. Big in SA and reasonable in England, but behind soccer of course. Perhaps biggest in Aus but hard to tell, although they're No 1 in the world. Certainly second in NZ to rugby. No longer dominant in the West Indies due to a ten year decline there, infighting and the allure of basketball. Played in other countries but these are the dominant ones.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
It's because of the pitch that either team got anywhere near 400...
I thought it was the bowling. Both sides had the same pitch. If Pollock had not withdrawn, then Aus would probably not have made the total it did, but then probably SA would not have played the same way it did. It certainly was not a 400 wicket - the batsmen on both sides made the game by playing some of the innings of their lives. I don't know how long before we see the likes of this again.

I see a couple of punters put down AU$20 000 after the end of the first innings for paltry returns (something like $200). I hope they could afford it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Eloquent stuff as usual from Peter Roebuck, but as always, some cynicism: http://tinyurl.com/mjsh2

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Give us a song, dyl.

Once a jolly swagman camped by a Billabong
Under the shade of a Coolabah tree
And he sang as he watched and waited till his billy boiled
"Who'll come a-waltzing Matilda with me?"

Down come a jumbuck to drink at the water hole
Up jumped a swagman and grabbed him in glee
And he sang as he stowed him away in his tucker bag
"You'll come a-waltzing Matilda with me'".

Up rode the Squatter a riding his thoroughbred
Up rode the Trooper - one, two, three
"Where's that jumbuck you've got in your tucker bag?",
"You'll come a-waltzing Matilda with me".

But the swagman he up and jumped in the water hole
Drowning himself by the Coolabah tree,
And his ghost may be heard as it sings in the Billabong,
"Who'll come a-waltzing Matilda with me?"

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Crowley

Once a jolly swagman camped by a Billabong
Under the shade of a Coolabah tree
And he sang as he watched and waited till his billy boiled
"Who'll come a-waltzing Matilda with me?"

Down come a jumbuck to drink at the water hole
Up jumped a swagman and grabbed him in glee
And he sang as he stowed him away in his tucker bag
"You'll come a-waltzing ...[text shortened]... as it sings in the Billabong,
"Who'll come a-waltzing Matilda with me?"
and "the Matilda's" is now the nickname of the Aussie women's soccer team - fabulous

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buffalobill
I thought it was the bowling. Both sides had the same pitch. If Pollock had not withdrawn, then Aus would probably not have made the total it did, but then probably SA would not have played the same way it did. It certainly was not a 400 wicket - the batsmen on both sides made the game by playing some of the innings of their lives. I don't know how long ...[text shortened]... end of the first innings for paltry returns (something like $200). I hope they could afford it.
No chance, to give away 900 odd runs in a 100 over match due to bowling alone would be some of the most pathetic bowling ever attempted. Hell, I know local club bowlers that wouldn't give away that many runs against a national side. You have to credit the pitch with at least 200 runs overall. I've seen bowling of that quality many times in ODI's and 320 type scores are the sort of totals you'd expect, even if the batsmen are on form.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Give us a song, dyl.
You don't bring me flowers
You don't sing me love songs
You hardly talk to me anymore
When I come thru the door
At the end of the day

I remember when
You couldn't wait to love me
Used to hate to leave me
Now after lovin' me late at night
When it's good for you, babe
And you're feelin' alright
Well you just roll over
And turn out the light
And you don't bring me flowers anymore

It used to be so natural
To talk about forever
But "used to be's" don't count anymore
They just lay on the floor
'Til we sweep them away

And baby, I remember
All the things you taught me
I learned how to laugh
And I learned how to cry
Well I leared how to love
And I learned how to lie
So you'd think I could learn
How to tell you goodbye
You don't bring me flowers anymore

Well you'd think I could learn
how to tell you 'goodbye'
You don't say you need me
You don't sing me love songs
You don't bring me flowers anymore