Go back
Cricket world record

Cricket world record

General

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Crowley
But the swagman he up and jumped in the water hole
Drowning himself by the Coolabah tree,
And his ghost may be heard as it sings in the Billabong,
"Who'll come a-waltzing Matilda with me?"
But the swagman he up and jumped in the water hole
You'll never catch me alive, said he,
And his ghost may be heard as it sings in the Billabong,
"Who'll come a-waltzing Matilda with me?"



You great goat.

Vote Up
Vote Down

This game was a disgrace.


I don't care who won, I love watching test cricket. If you don't, go screw yourself.


Not everyone needs to hit like shahid friggin afridi... 😠

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Aus will win the test. It only took us 4 batsmen to reach 434. Seth Efrika used 9. They made the pitches dead to eliminate Warney in the test, but we still have better batting depth. Needless to say it will be a great series. Smith is a tool.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Esoteric
Homo
Self descriptions aren't necesary here on the debates, esoerotica.....

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Tetsujin
This game was a disgrace.


I don't care who won, I love watching test cricket. If you don't, go screw yourself.


Not everyone needs to hit like shahid friggin afridi... 😠
Yes, the game was a disgrace really. I mean, cricket is about bowlers too - not just batsmen. It would have been a much better game on a wicket offering something for the bowlers and a score(s) around 260 or so..

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dyl
So we all agreed that it was because of the pitch that Australia lost?
Of course not! Both teams played on the same pitch. Australia lost because South Africa scored more runs! 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AussieG
Yes, the game was a disgrace really. I mean, cricket is about bowlers too - not just batsmen. It would have been a much better game on a wicket offering something for the bowlers and a score(s) around 260 or so..
Please, a few different shots and SA would've only had 300 odd.
Then everyone would be singing Australia's praises for kicking SA's asses all over the Wanderers.

The Wanderers pitch is basically always a 300+ wicket, both teams just batted very aggressively and pulled it off.
SA actually knuckled down and made a game of it, breaking records left and right. Now the pitch gets all the blame.
Ugh.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Crowley
The Wanderers pitch is basically always a 300+ wicket.
LOL!
http://uk.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2004-05/ENG_IN_RSA/SCORECARDS/ENG_RSA_ODI1_30JAN2005.html

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Varg
LOL!
http://uk.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2004-05/ENG_IN_RSA/SCORECARDS/ENG_RSA_ODI1_30JAN2005.html
Hehe, yes.
Although I'm sure you will find a lower score than that on every single ODI pitch in the world.
On the day the pitch report was that this was a 300 wicket and this is usually the 'easiest' pitch in SA to bat on.