Originally posted by Heavyhitter19What about a person's duty to the human race not to cause suffering in another human?
I happened by the one here in Vancouver, by chance. It sickened me that their keynote speaker was a deserter from the US Army. Good young people are dying for others, and this cowardly puke is running away? Worst is my country is allowing him to live here, while Canadians are dying fighting for freedom as well? If you're against the was there are w ...[text shortened]... be a man and do your duty. Cowards have given up their right to free speech, plain and simple.
Originally posted by chancremechanic"priapism?" What are you, some kind of intellectual or something?
"There's a 'bad moon' on the rising"...CCR, circa, 1970..bad moon, you sound like the sensitive type. To all feedom-loving, red-blooded Americans on this web-site, I apologoze for this kneejerk responder who probably fantasizes about bin-Laden's 72-virgin-induced priapism.....badmoon, go look in the mirror and apologize for the zit that sits between your shoulders....
1 edit
Originally posted by XanthosNZWell, your avatar surely resembles an erection. Is that a self-portrait?
I like how he used priapism in an attempt to look smart even though a less cromulent word would have done just as well.
EDIT: Chancre wouldn't know an erection if one choked him to death.
cromulent?.....🙄
Originally posted by XanthosNZHow about a person's duty to the human race to "prevent" others from causing harm and suffering to another human....can't have your kock, I mean cake, and eat it too.....🙄....well, in your case maybe you can......
What about a person's duty to the human race not to cause suffering in another human?
Originally posted by chancremechanicI'm sure that's exactly what the American Soldiers were doing in Abu Graib.
How about a person's duty to the human race to "prevent" others from causing harm and suffering to another human....can't have your kock, I mean cake, and eat it too.....🙄....well, in your case maybe you can......
1 edit
Originally posted by XanthosNZIs that all you got? Abu Graib? That was a frat party compared to what your pals the Islamofascistas are doing to prisoners...have you hugged your suicide bomber today?
I'm sure that's exactly what the American Soldiers were doing in Abu Graib.
By the way, what are all those blokes on your profile picture doing opening and closing their mouths .....as if they expect something fleshy to be placed their....your sphalanx-shaped avatar...these mouthing blokes= what?
Please enlighten us...
Originally posted by chancremechanicAs a red blooded American, I apologize for his hypocracy. Freedom? Does this not mean that Cindy Sheehan can protest if she wants? That a person can be a Democrat and not be criticized for it? I'll leave the 'right wing' off. Jerk.
"There's a 'bad moon' on the rising"...CCR, circa, 1970..bad moon, you sound like the sensitive type. To all feedom-loving, red-blooded Americans on this web-site, I apologoze for this kneejerk responder who probably fantasizes about bin-Laden's 72-virgin-induced priapism.....badmoon, go look in the mirror and apologize for the zit that sits between your shoulders....
Originally posted by XanthosNZIts sad how during a debate of views, you choose to see only one side of the picture. How about the poor prisons of the other side who are continually MURDERED, or did you forget about them??? Fact of the matter is, had a lot of folks not stood up to people like Hitler, you wouldn't even be allowed to talk like this. That's the wonders of freedom. Reminds me of the 70's when the hippie's were burning the flag, and protesting Vietnam. A few loud mouths yapping off, at the price of someone else's sacrifice. The bottom line is this, were there weapons of mass destruction....NO, did Saddam need to be taken down....YES. Only problem I see is we should have done it during the 1st war with them, and the troops would probably be home by now. Your freedom to exchange views has been won by men and women who stood up for what they believed was right, or at least their Gov't believed was right. Most don't question it, they just try to do their best, and hope they come home safe to their families. Seems to me the least we could do is to support them, or is that too much to ask??
I'm sure that's exactly what the American Soldiers were doing in Abu Graib.
Originally posted by Heavyhitter19Yes, it is too much to ask that people support a brutal, murderous occupation of another country. The propaganda about "supporting the troops" doesn't cut it with me; the best way to support the troops is to try and make sure they don't have their lives thrown away for ignominous purposes. The military of a country is to protect it from attack from foreign shores. The presence of US troops in the Middle East ever meddling in the internal affairs of the people there and killing ten of thousands of them, makes our country less secure. Surely the lessons of the last few years make that clear. To continue to try to dominate other countries for the enrichment of a few and the misery of the many (including most Americans) is folly and one has a patriotic duty to oppose a government that does such things.
Its sad how during a debate of views, you choose to see only one side of the picture. How about the poor prisons of the other side who are continually MURDERED, or did you forget about them??? Fact of the matter is, had a lot of folks not stood up to people like Hitler, you wouldn't even be allowed to talk like this. That's the wonders of freedom. ...[text shortened]... lies. Seems to me the least we could do is to support them, or is that too much to ask??
Originally posted by no1marauderIf that is true, then why was Bush re elected? Seems to me you should be protesting the Gov't, not the troops carrying out their orders?
Yes, it is too much to ask that people support a brutal, murderous occupation of another country. The propaganda about "supporting the troops" doesn't cut it with me; the best way to support the troops is to try and make sure they don't have their lives thrown away for ignominous purposes. The military of a country is to protect it from attack from forei ...[text shortened]... ericans) is folly and one has a patriotic duty to oppose a government that does such things.
Originally posted by Derfel Cadarn"Red-blooded American"....LMAO.....you bleed pink, and you know it! Start "jerking"......"Derf the smerf"
As a red blooded American, I apologize for his hypocracy. Freedom? Does this not mean that Cindy Sheehan can protest if she wants? That a person can be a Democrat and not be criticized for it? I'll leave the 'right wing' off. Jerk.