Go back
Emulation of Courseware

Emulation of Courseware

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

I have just finished a paper on the emulation of courseware. I'd like to hear what you think about it. Here's the paper: http://punitive-surgery.lcs.mit.edu/scicache/818/scimakelatex.81808.Aurora+Borealis.html

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
I have just finished a paper on the emulation of courseware. I'd like to hear what you think about it. Here's the paper: http://punitive-surgery.lcs.mit.edu/scicache/818/scimakelatex.81808.Aurora+Borealis.html
Have you informed Murrow & Co of the non-game-theoretic limitations of the lookaside buffer? 🙄 Really, Snorty, you owe it to them...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
I have just finished a paper on the emulation of courseware. I'd like to hear what you think about it. Here's the paper: http://punitive-surgery.lcs.mit.edu/scicache/818/scimakelatex.81808.Aurora+Borealis.html
Window says document does not exist.. SCIgen homepage.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Window says document does not exist.. SCIgen homepage.
Drat, I should have saved it. Now I'll rather have to talk about robots: http://punitive-surgery.lcs.mit.edu/scicache/866/scimakelatex.5398.Aurora+Borealis.html

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
Drat, I should have saved it. Now I'll rather have to talk about robots: http://punitive-surgery.lcs.mit.edu/scicache/866/scimakelatex.5398.Aurora+Borealis.html
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. Can't you resubmit the paper to SCIgen? Was the subject Northern Lights?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. Can't you resubmit the paper to SCIgen? Was the subject Northern Lights?
As I said, the subject was the Emulation of Courseware. As widget mentioned, it also discussed the use and limitations of a lookaside buffer. I can't resubmit it, because I don't have a copy.

Edit: Aurora Borealis is just my screen name.

Vote Up
Vote Down

My pc says it's corrupt!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
As I said, the subject was the Emulation of Courseware. As widget mentioned, it also discussed the use and limitations of a lookaside buffer. I can't resubmit it, because I don't have a copy.

Edit: Aurora Borealis is just my screen name.
As our English friends would say: Hard cheese.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
I have just finished a paper on the emulation of courseware. I'd like to hear what you think about it. Here's the paper: http://punitive-surgery.lcs.mit.edu/scicache/818/scimakelatex.81808.Aurora+Borealis.html
Your wonderful paper put me in mind of this one that I stumbled upon this recently
http://tinyurl.com/2xsquq

I'd be interested to hear your views in this one Nordlys

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by orangutan
Your wonderful paper put me in mind of this one that I stumbled upon this recently
http://tinyurl.com/2xsquq

I'd be interested to hear your views in this one Nordlys
An interesting study. However, I don't believe that making your compilers psychoacoustic, stable, and knowledge-based will help you in your aim to deconstruct robots. I'll watch out for Rodney Brooks, though.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Is there a full moon tonight? 🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Is there a full moon tonight? 🙄
I see you have published a paper there as well! http://punitive-surgery.lcs.mit.edu/scicache/945/scimakelatex.7687.H.+Andy.html

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
I see you have published a paper there as well! http://punitive-surgery.lcs.mit.edu/scicache/945/scimakelatex.7687.H.+Andy.html
I'm afraid to look.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
I'm afraid to look.
Don't worry, it's just an evaluation of active networks. You could have chosen a more interesting subject, but well done nevertheless.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
An interesting study. However, I don't believe that making your compilers psychoacoustic, stable, and knowledge-based will help you in your aim to deconstruct robots. I'll watch out for Rodney Brooks, though.
This was indeed the central conclusion.
It all stemmed from the fact than non-psychoacoustic, unstable compilers were almost always ignorance based. Harris showed this with his consistent hashing.

We simply worked backwards from there.

Rodney Brooks is definitely one to watch.