Go back
From Palynka

From Palynka

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

"Any comment on how mikelom thinks American English is "bastardised English"? - quote.


Well isn't it derived English, from an original rich source of words that are now lazily used and misspelled on another continent?

English derives from the original Germanics, Roman and Greek richness that created such a mix of diversity, doesn't it?

I see true usage of rich true English used by American educated persons, who are proud that they have studied and learned Oxford English....

so aint we got it already?

Palynka, you are wrong to assume that American English is indeed English in correct usage. I call you to qualify your reasons for believing it is English in the true sense of those exact words you tried to qualify.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mikelom
"Any comment on how mikelom thinks American English is "bastardised English"? - quote.


Well isn't it derived English, from an original rich source of words that are now lazily used and misspelled on another continent?

English derives from the original Germanics, Roman and Greek richness that created such a mix of diversity, doesn't it?

I see true ...[text shortened]... ns for believing it is English in the true sense of those exact words you tried to qualify.
Ah, so English is rich because it "bastardized" (to use your words) Greek, Germanics and Roman and yet American is poor because it added to those influences.

Did I get this right? Because it seems that you're just the typical parochial fool.

Who are these supposedly educated American people who feel the need to use Oxford English? Because American literature is filled with people who don't write in Oxford English.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mikelom
"Any comment on how mikelom thinks American English is "bastardised English"? - quote.


Well isn't it derived English, from an original rich source of words that are now lazily used and misspelled on another continent?

English derives from the original Germanics, Roman and Greek richness that created such a mix of diversity, doesn't it?

I see true ...[text shortened]... ns for believing it is English in the true sense of those exact words you tried to qualify.
We, "on another continent", who live on the northern portion of it, do use (spell) the "proper" English so please be a bit more specific when referring to the subject. Thanks.


GBS


😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Great Big Stees
We, "on another continent", who live on the northern portion of it, do use (spell) the "proper" English so please be a bit more specific when referring to the subject. Thanks.


GBS


😏
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_English

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Ah, so English is rich because it "bastardized" (to use your words) Greek, Germanics and Roman and yet American is poor because it added to those influences.

Did I get this right? Because it seems that you're just the typical parochial fool.

Who are these supposedly educated American people who feel the need to use Oxford English? Because American literature is filled with people who don't write in Oxford English.
You didn't use my word.

I wrote "bastardised", not "bastardized" just because your spell checker corrected it to American shiiiite!'

I certainly didn't English was bastardised Gremanics, Latin etc... it is and is a developed language historically and is where it is at because it has preogressed naturally, without external asylum.

American English has been influenced by the absorbtion of Latino and influx of lazy non-English speakers for the last 150 years,....... that has made it a lazy lingo. I am sure most Americans agree that American English is a lazy sabattical of what was a once richly used lingo by the original settlers.

Why don't we await responses,,, before your continued and laborious bitching. 😴

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Nope!

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mikelom
I certainly didn't English was bastardised Gremanics, Latin etc... it is and is a developed language historically and is where it is at because it has preogressed naturally, without external asylum.
What type of English is this? 😵

Really, who else but expats could teach English when they write like this?

Vote Up
Vote Down

ah, oxford english. the degenerated leftovers of bastardized proto-germanic.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
What type of English is this? 😵

Really, who else but expats could teach English when they write like this?
Better than writing 'whiskey'.

You tire me with your pedantics.

I don't need to qualify myself to you, and nor do I ever ask you to do so to me.

If you feel that expats do malpractice and disservice to others then I suggest you write a thread about it. You'll find out just how unpopular you really are then!

You also seem to lack the knowledge of time difference between continents.

Goodnight!

Vote Up
Vote Down

A friend of mine went to teach English in Thailand for two years or something like that. He was an E student with no teaching experience or qualification and as for his command of the language... well let's just say that they'll take anyone.

He had a wonderful time though. Upon his return he didn't shut up about Thailand for months.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mikelom
Better than writing 'whiskey'.
With few exceptions, the spelling is Scottish, Canadian, and Japanese whisky (plural: whiskies), but Irish and American whiskey (whiskeys). -wikipedia

Where are you from?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
What type of English is this? 😵
That wasn't English, that was bastardised Gremanics! 😵

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
That wasn't English, that was bastardised Gremanics! 😵
Are those Gremans making trouble again?