Originally posted by Elamef37Tell me where I said you can't participate in the conversation.
Excuse me, but a number of times, he has intimated I am ignorant. I was being sarcy, and just thought, I'd throw it in his face.
I don't see its your place to tell me what conversations I can participate in and what I can't.
Perhaps you should read on Aboriginal History in this country, and then you'll see where I'm coming from.
I have "read on aboriginal history" in Australia.
Originally posted by cashthetrashNo, it's not; the same rationale for banning images from Roots would apply to banning images from Schindler's List.
Understand these word:
I"M NOT RED NIGHT.
This subject is a different argument all together. I'm not making deals with you. You were wrong.
We both know you agree with his sentiment regarding pictures of Nazi victims; it dovetails 100% with your arguments regarding black men in chains. Admit it and get it over with.
Originally posted by no1marauderYou tell 'em no1. I once went to school with a swastika on my shirt but got suspended because some Jewish boy found it offensive. I know the swastika is not offensive in and off itself because I saw it in Wal-Mart on an old war movie DVD. The hypersensitivity of the school and that Jew is astonishing, no? You'd think they've never even been to Wal-Mart...
Was the same picture too offensive to be put in Wal-Mart or any of the other retail outlets where the Roots DVD was sold?
Why should this site have more hypersensitive standards than a retail store?
Originally posted by Raven69Priceless. We should give you a raise.
You tell 'em no1. I once went to school with a swastika on my shirt but got suspended because some Jewish boy found it offensive. I know the swastika is not offensive in and off itself because I saw it in Wal-Mart on an old war movie DVD. The hypersensitivity of the school and that Jew is astonishing, no? You'd think they've never even been to Wal-Mart...