1 edit
Originally posted by Raven69😴😴
You tell 'em no1. I once went to school with a swastika on my shirt but got suspended because some Jewish boy found it offensive. I know the swastika is not offensive in and off itself because I saw it in Wal-Mart on an old war movie DVD. The hypersensitivity of the school and that Jew is astonishing, no? You'd think they've never even been to Wal-Mart...
An answer to the question raised would be nice though probably something you're incapable of.
Originally posted by no1marauderSo your are not going to apologize for lying and spreading propaganda then? Typical Hitler-ish type of behavior.
No, it's not; the same rationale for banning images from Roots would apply to banning images from Schindler's List.
We both know you agree with his sentiment regarding pictures of Nazi victims; it dovetails 100% with your arguments regarding black men in chains. Admit it and get it over with.
1 edit
Originally posted by cashthetrashRacist, anti-semitic, Hitler, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH.
So your are not going to apologize for lying and spreading propaganda then? Typical Hitler-ish type of behavior.
The TSM mantra.
Apparently you consider it a "lie" to say someone believes something that they do. Most people would find that a bit bizarre.
Originally posted by no1marauderWWWMD? What Would Wal-mart Do?
It's not an answer at all to the question I raised to wit:
Why should this site have more hypersensitive standards than a retail store?
Would Wal-mart allow a white employee to wear a picture of a chained black slave on his shirt?
I think the answer to that is an emphatic no.
Daniel Lorentz was fired last week upon reporting for duty in his priest's shirt with Roman collar, an Arab headdress and six crosses.
"Wal-Mart provides reasonable accommodation with respect to the dress code when it is appropriate to do so based on a bona fide religious belief," said a Wal-mart spokesperson. The company "will not honor requests that show a lack of respect for the faiths of others."
Originally posted by no1marauderLook I am going to give you your answer, even though you are not man enough to apologize. I have no idea what others think. But you asked me what I think, so I will tell you straight. I know it won't shut you up though. You have no conscience.
Racist, anti-semitic BLAH, BLAH, BLAH.
The TSM mantra.
I personally think that putting up images of naked and malnourished guys who were abused tortured and killed in concentration camps even if it was part of a movie and sold at walmart, has no place here on RHP for people to put up as a avatar. I think it is gut wrenching and nauseating. And to be honest it infuriates me. Why because, I have seen war first hand and it puts visual images in my mind I have spent years trying to remove. I hope that helps, but I doubt it will.
Originally posted by Red NightNon sequitur. And red herring.
WWWMD? What Would Wal-mart Do?
Would Wal-mart allow a white employee to wear a picture of a chained black slave on his shirt?
I think the answer to that is an emphatic no.
Daniel Lorentz was fired last week upon reporting for duty in his priest's shirt with Roman collar, an Arab headdress and six crosses.
"Wal-Mart provides reasonable accom ...[text shortened]... The company "will not honor requests that show a lack of respect for the faiths of others."
Originally posted by cashthetrashI'm sorry for your hypersensitivity.
Look I am going to give you your answer, even though you are not man enough to apologize. I have no idea what others think. But you asked me what I think, so I will tell you straight. I know it won't shut you up though. You have no conscience.
I personally think that putting up images of naked and malnourished guys who were abused tortured and kille ...[text shortened]... images in my mind I have spent years trying to remove. I hope that helps, but I doubt it will.
But I don't agree that the lowest level of sensitivity should be guiding standard for a forum meant to encourage discussion and expression.
Originally posted by no1marauderWell it wasn't the answer you were looking for, but it was a great answer, and brought a smile to my face! " Lighten Up "
It's not an answer at all to the question I raised to wit:
Why should this site have more hypersensitive standards than a retail store?
Perhaps Wal-Mart should give this site, a cut of their profits if you want the site to do what Wal-Mart does.
Do you think that the Admins should adjust the TOS to what Wal-Mart does?
Originally posted by Very RustyThese "points" have already been addressed.
Well it wasn't the answer you were looking for, but it was a great answer, and brought a smile to my face! " Lighten Up "
Perhaps Wal-Mart should give this site, a cut of their profits if you want the site to do what Wal-Mart does.
Do you think that the Admins should adjust the TOS to what Wal-Mart does?
My question remains unanswered.
Originally posted by no1marauderI'm sorry you are so obtuse and impervious to such issues that are shared world wide by millions of others.
I'm sorry for your hypersensitivity.
But I don't agree that the lowest level of sensitivity should be guiding standard for a forum meant to encourage discussion and expression.
Still, what does that have to do with the fact that you were spreading propaganda?
Originally posted by cashthetrashAnd yet we have remembrance days every year, where all these memories must come flooding back to you.
I personally think that putting up images of naked and malnourished guys who were abused tortured and killed in concentration camps even if it was part of a movie and sold at walmart, has no place here on RHP for people to put up as a avatar. I think it is gut wrenching and nauseating. And to be honest it infuriates me. Why because, I have seen war fi ...[text shortened]... l images in my mind I have spent years trying to remove. I hope that helps, but I doubt it will.
What next, do we stop remembrance days, war films etc, etc or is it only on certain forms of media you wish this stopped?