@kquinn909 saidWhat has “gun control” got to do with “willingness” to give up guns?
After the recent shooting the dims and hollywierd are again calling for more gun control. BUT. Not a single one is willing to give up their weapons or armed bodyguards.
Bodyguards would surely be exempt from any “controls” wouldn’t they, or are you expecting The Donald to be completely surrounded by wrestlers and Kung Fu ninjas?
05 Aug 19
@fmf saidEveryone would still be alive is not quite an accurate statement in my opinion, but agreed less people would have died. Unfortunately this is the world we live in today.
If only the Democrats hadn't banned guns in Ohio and Texas. If bystanders had been allowed to own and carry guns, someone could have shot the shooters before they started and now everyone would still be alive.
-VR
05 Aug 19
@great-big-stees saidTrue, however if some person has a gun available and ample of ammounition they will certainly do more damage than if they don't.
Guns will always be available to anyone who is determined to get them...illegally..."Show me the money".
🙁
Buying a gun illegally is fine for career criminals who will very seldom be committing mass shootings, having other things on their mind. (Making money)
05 Aug 19
@fmf saidI bet most did not get the sarcasm in your post.
If only the Democrats hadn't banned guns in Ohio and Texas. If bystanders had been allowed to own and carry guns, someone could have shot the shooters before they started and now everyone would still be alive.
@very-rusty saidWhoosh...
Everyone would still be alive is not quite an accurate statement in my opinion, but agreed less people would have died. Unfortunately this is the world we live in today.
06 Aug 19
@great-big-stees saidSurely restricting and regulating supply of fully automatic assault riffles is a good thing though?
Guns will always be available to anyone who is determined to get them...illegally..."Show me the money".
🙁
06 Aug 19
@very-rusty saidFor Pete's sake Rusty, get that sarcasm detector fixed.
Everyone would still be alive is not quite an accurate statement in my opinion, but agreed less people would have died. Unfortunately this is the world we live in today.
-VR
06 Aug 19
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIt is hard to get sarcasm sometimes! 😉 :p
For Pete's sake Rusty, get that sarcasm detector fixed.
Easy with you though you make it very plain you're being sarcastic! 😉
-VR
06 Aug 19
@very-rusty saidCollective sigh across the known universe.
No whoosh about it, you are living in a fantasy world if you think others could have stopped it if carrying guns, people still would been shot, perhaps not as many killed.
Wake up and smell the rosee. Make a little sense for a change.
-VR
06 Aug 19
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou may soon need some mental help goad! 😉
Collective sigh across the known universe.
-VR
06 Aug 19
@very-rusty saidFMFs post was dripping in beautiful sarcasm. How you missed that is beyond me. (And the many people who thumbed it up).
You may soon need some mental help goad! 😉
-VR