Originally posted by catfoodtimNoted, I will no longer edit a posting.
I don't bother you so much that you come back and edit your original post a good 10 minutes later? You've being getting to work now for a while, but you keep returning to this issue.
Rag made 2 interesting responses to you. Are you going to step up to the plate and answer him?
Everytime you and RN's zombie drones abuse someone you in the forums its reinforces the widely held view that you're all fatuous hypocrites.
Rag, posted something to me. I will have to go look again.
Yes I am at work and I go away when the boss walks in.
it's a back and forth thing.
I think it's funny how there are now rec's to be given and all of a sudden. theres fights to be had.
let's shake hands and move on.
I didn't wake up today to get going in this direction.
Originally posted by catfoodtimOk, you win again.
This one:
http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=54647&page=3#post_1017565
Where you say "This is just away for those who hold the rec's in high esteem to keep talking about them." in response to my thread, and Ragnarok points out 2 of your posts that you keep talking about recs:
http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php ...[text shortened]... what I mean! You're all so full of your own sanctimony but your own hypocrisy escapes you.
I would have had how many post on this subject? If you did not PM me? Like I asked can we move on now?
Originally posted by IM4Y2NVI don't think you can have a dig at people for something you are guilty of and then, when called on it, say, let's move on.
Ok, you win again.
I would have had how many post on this subject? If you did not PM me? Like I asked can we move on now?
Also, if you don't wish to be called on it, you shouldn't start your day by posting what amounted to calling another person thick. Whether you quoted him or not, it was blatantly obvious who you were talking about. Am I incorrect?
As you previously mentioned, did you say CFT was thick because you thought you might get some recs? Is that why you started your day with a healthy dose of inflammatory posts?
D
Originally posted by RagnorakI suppose you'll call me a hypocrite for pointing out that Tuna's posts were pretty inflamatory.
I don't think you can have a dig at people for something you are guilty of and then, when called on it, say, let's move on.
Also, if you don't wish to be called on it, you shouldn't start your day by posting what amounted to calling another person thick. Whether you quoted him or not, it was blatantly obvious who you were talking about. Am I incorrect? ...[text shortened]... some recs? Is that why you started your day with a healthy dose of inflammatory posts?
D
Let's get one thing straight, from what I've read here this morning you and Tuna are in no position to seize the moral hgih ground.
Chriss, IM, Cash, and all: good morning. I hope you all have a wonderful day.
The Cowboys looked pretty bad last night. Sports forum would be nice. I could say a lot about that. Kept me up all night replaying that game in my mind. Don't know what to think about those guys. Lost two division games thus far. But on a positive note. Maybe the Cowboys will have a new Quarter Back. We will see, Tony Romo had good moments and terrible moments but we will see.
Originally posted by cashthetrashGood morning Red I love to watch the Sun come up in the mornings, but my eyes are pretty red right now. Time for some more coffee.
The Cowboys looked pretty bad last night. Sports forum would be nice. I could say a lot about that. Kept me up all night replaying that game in my mind. Don't know what to think about those guys. Lost two division games thus far. But on a positive note. Maybe the Cowboys will have a new Quarter Back. We will see, Tony Romo had good moments and terrible moments but we will see.
1 edit
Originally posted by Red Night"Tuna's" posts where he asked a number of times how the new rec system works? Where is the offence in them?
I suppose you'll call me a hypocrite for pointing out that Tuna's posts were pretty inflamatory.
Let's get one thing straight, from what I've read here this morning you and Tuna are in no position to seize the moral hgih ground.
I reread my posts of this morning, and as far as I can see, the only thing that you could possibly have a problem with is my post telling people to stay happy and not to divulge personal information to online "friends".
Why do you have a problem with me trying to help inexperienced kids from worst case scenarios?
D