Originally posted by FreakyKBHThere you go again.
Yeah.
So let's get back to those completely unrelated disagreements again.
Outside of your penchant for consistently being on the wrong side of the argument, one of the reasons you have become a persona non grata pariah of a poster in literally every forum you present your toxic bile is on exhibit in your response to my condolences.
- Joined
- 23 Nov 09
- Moves
- 146580
Originally posted by FreakyKBHDude ... take it easy on the Koolaid, it might poison you and subsequently kill you. You are not more in the right than you adversary is. Strong words or claiming to be "on the right side of an argument" ( if that even exists ) will not change that.
Yeah.
So let's get back to those completely unrelated disagreements again.
Outside of your penchant for consistently being on the wrong side of the argument, one of the reasons you have become a persona non grata pariah of a poster in literally every forum you present your toxic bile is on exhibit in your response to my condolences.
Originally posted by KeggeI'll kindly suggest you go back and re-read what I wrote.
Dude ... take it easy on the Koolaid, it might poison you and subsequently kill you. You are not more in the right than you adversary is. Strong words or claiming to be "on the right side of an argument" ( if that even exists ) will not change that.
I didn't claim to always be right, I claimed that FMF is consistently on the wrong side of the argument.
1 edit
Originally posted by FreakyKBHOh well you didn't like the humour, never mind. I thought it summed up the nature of what you're saying pretty well. "...FMF is consistently on the wrong side of the argument" may be "perfectly clear" but as a supposed 'debating point' or attempted put down ~ along with stuff like you're a pariah and stuff about my toxic bile ~ all because I pointed out to you that you had completely missed the point of my anecdote ~ it's just kind of silly.
Leave it to you to jack up a perfectly clear statement with a poor attempt at humor.
Show me where I've accused anyone of feeling "psychotic jealousy" or being a "sociopathic liar" or of comparing someone's posts to "stinking vomit" or "fouled diapers" and then perhaps we can talk about "toxic bile".
Oh, so you're simply declaring me to be wrong about stuff on matters where you disagree with me. Well done. It reminds me of how you made a complete fool of yourself ~ in my view, I appreciate we are not going to agree about it ~ on the 'flat earth' thread on the Spirituality Forum... so how did you deal with it? You just kept declaring yourself to have won the argument over and over again until people who had engineered your public undoing just ignored you. 🙂
Originally posted by FMFBlah, blah, blah... something about one item calling another the same thing...
Oh well you didn't like the humour, never mind. I thought it summed up the nature of what you're saying pretty well. "...FMF is consistently on the wrong side of the argument" may be "perfectly clear" but as a supposed 'debating point' or attempted put down ~ along with stuff like you're a pariah and stuff about my toxic bile ~ all because I pointe ...[text shortened]... nt over and over again until people who had engineered your public undoing just ignored you. 🙂
Oh.
And then you bring up the flat earth conversation?
You certainly recall the turmoil that thread caused, wherein every single one of the "people who had engineered (my) public undoing" couldn't express their beliefs or knowledge in anything resembling a cogent form?
Where their claims were not only inconsistent within the narrative, but in disagreement with reality?
Well (to quote a famous movie line which actually was used), you got that going for you.
Which is nice.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHYou're still declaring yourself the winner? 😀
And then you bring up the flat earth conversation?
You certainly recall the turmoil that thread caused, wherein every single one of the "people who had engineered (my) public undoing" couldn't express their beliefs or knowledge in anything resembling a cogent form?
Where their claims were not only inconsistent within the narrative, but in disagreement with reality?
People can decide for themselves: Thread 165913.
Originally posted by FMFBack to your usual tripe again.
You're [b]still declaring yourself the winner? 😀
People can decide for themselves: Thread 165913.[/b]
Your puerile perspective only allows you to approach these posts looking for winners and losers instead of discovering the truth.
There are no 'winners' or 'losers' when it comes to the truth; you're either with the truth or you're against it.
In the case of that particular thread, there were about five or six people who represented themselves as against the truth and they did so poorly.
Their claims were either inconsistent, self-contradictory, at odds with reality, or some combination of all three.
Even when faced with reputable and trusted outside sources completely unrelated to the topic which nonetheless confirmed the claims they were arguing against, those who continued their efforts simply denied the plain truth put before them.
So, by all means, encourage folks to go see for themselves how silly those who set themselves against the truth appear, how contorted their thinking must be to sustain support for untenable positions.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHA few stylistic aspects aside, this post could have been written by Dasa.
Back to your usual tripe again.
Your puerile perspective only allows you to approach these posts looking for winners and losers instead of discovering the truth.
There are no 'winners' or 'losers' when it comes to the truth; you're either with the truth or you're against it.
In the case of that particular thread, there were about five or six peopl ...[text shortened]... e truth appear, how contorted their thinking must be to sustain support for untenable positions.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI already did encourage people to decide for themselves. Here is the link again: Thread 165913.
So, by all means, encourage folks to go see for themselves how silly those who set themselves against the truth appear, how contorted their thinking must be to sustain support for untenable positions.
Originally posted by FMFDoubling down on a hard twelve, eh?
I already did encourage people to decide for themselves. Here is the link again: Thread 165913.
Results are still the same: you're yet again on the wrong side of the argument, vehemently waving your arms and insisting you're supported by reality no matter how lost you've become.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHPeople should listen to the things you said on the thread rather than all this bluster. If they think your assertions are right then so be it.
Doubling down on a hard twelve, eh?
Results are still the same: you're yet again on the wrong side of the argument, vehemently waving your arms and insisting you're supported by reality no matter how lost you've become.
Originally quoted by robbie carrobie...so says FreakyKBH who has spent the last three of his posts on this thread declaring himself the winner - and everybody else the losers - of the argument that was had on the thread in question.
"Your puerile perspective only allows you to approach these posts looking for winners and losers instead of discovering the truth"