Originally posted by SeitseHenry may be good, very good, but worth losing Ronaldinho for? Surely not.
That would be the headache, to give away Ronaldinho for Henry,
but I don't mind if Etoo is released. In my opinion it is harder to find a
replacement for Ronaldinho than a replacement for Etoo (Henry
could do it easily). Etoo is not that big deal... he just has behind him
a really powerful attacking midfield. What do you think?
Well, Manchester will w ...[text shortened]... s pupils about the harshness of such a difficult competition. How's the bench of ManU looking?
Originally posted by SeitseHe is OK now but he missed a lot of games last year.
Oh damn, is he injured?!?!
He is a player who really need his pace so it could be like Chelsea buying Shev.
Henry is pure class but like a very sharp blade, all the easier to blunt.
Where as Beckham never relied on pace so is a safer buy for Galaxy.
Originally posted by petrosianpupilOMG, I really can't believe it.
He is OK now but he missed a lot of games last year.
He is a player who really need his pace so it could be like Chelsea buying Shev.
Henry is pure class but like a very sharp blade, all the easier to blunt.
Where as Beckham never relied on pace so is a safer buy for Galaxy.
Henry has been consistently in the top 3 players in the Premiership for almost 7 years.
He is arguably the geatest Premiership player ever.
He is still in his 20's, this is the first time he has been injury prone all season.
Its the first time he has been slightly inconsistent when playing.
And you claim he has lost his pace and 'easy to blunt'.
Please send Henry to Manchester United or I would even rather see him at Liverpool, than get called a 'potential has been' by an Arsenal fan after the first small bad patch of his career (once Wenger got him playing).
Henry when rested next season will be awesome whoever he plays for.
You really should be ashamed at writing him off, how old is he 28?
After everything he's done at Arsenal..........