@torunn saidCertainly not worth calling them scum, eh, Rusty? This is why you were warned to "be careful".
Rusty, we have the possibility of choosing whether to subscribe or not. Some of us do and some don't, for different reasons. I fail to see why one way would be better than the other - it's a personal choice.
Cue the idiotic response from Rusty.
@very-rusty saidI advised him to ignore your posts.
Really? What brilliant advice have you given him?
-VR
@ghost-of-a-duke saidBack of the net......The Ghost shoots he scores GOAD 1 VR 0
I advised him to ignore your posts.
@badradger saidLOL...What a suck up your turning into badger!!!! π π
Back of the net......The Ghost shoots he scores GOAD 1 VR 0
-VR
@suzianne saidSuzie Q, you know as well as I do it was used quite frequently in the past even by the Moderators of the time!!! π
Certainly not worth calling them scum, eh, Rusty? This is why you were warned to "be careful".
Do you think an idle warning from goad means a thing to me? I haven't heard a thing from a Moderator!!! π π
-VR
@very-rusty saidThere was nothing idle in my warning. You agreed the term belonged in the past. (A little slow on the uptake, but good enough). So I gave you the benefit of the doubt.
Suzie Q, you know as well as I do it was used quite frequently in the past even by the Moderators of the time!!! π
Do you think an idle warning from goad means a thing to me? I haven't heard a thing from a Moderator!!! π π
-VR
But try using that term again here in the GF, to the belittlement of the many non-subscribers who contribute here, and you will reap the full fury of the Ghost.