Originally posted by rbmorrisDo I do that? OK, I'll try to tone it down. I wasn't the one who brought it up in this thread certainly. I wonder how often I mentioned it? I'll check my post history.
It's fine that you smoke pot or whatever. What you do in your spare time is no business of mine (or anyone else's), unless you're a neurosurgeon or an air-traffic controller or something like that. On the other hand, unless you're in a rock band or something, drugs have no place in a productive office environment. I hate corporate sheep more than just ab ...[text shortened]... others. That whole, "he smokes pot, yeah, he's cool" thing is pretty dumb.
Originally posted by AThousandYoungAs you're known drug using riff raff this should be self evident.
I just checked the last 30 pages of posts I made. I referred to marijuana or weed twice. Both times someone else brought it up. Once was here, and once was in a thread named "Stoned Chess".
What are you talking about?
Originally posted by AThousandYoungA lot. Aren't you the one who thinks the cops have no right to hassle you for breaking the law by smoking pot because you have a right to happiness, etc.? You never mentioned medicinal purposes, but it's come up enough in your posts that it seems like an integral part of your character or on-line persona.
Do I do that? OK, I'll try to tone it down. I wasn't the one who brought it up in this thread certainly. I wonder how often I mentioned it? I'll check my post history.
4 edits
Originally posted by pawnhandlerExamples please? Recent ones especially.
A lot. Aren't you the one who thinks the cops have no right to hassle you for breaking the law by smoking pot because you have a right to happiness, etc.? You never mentioned medicinal purposes, but it's come up enough in your posts that it seems like an integral part of your character or on-line persona.
The police have a duty to enforce the law, so it's tough to put this on them. My position is more that the citizens have no right to make anti-drug laws.
I suspect you're just obsessed with my marijuana use versus my atheism, or my nationality, my age, my education, my Shub-Niggurath theme, my location, my skin color, my heritage or any number of things about myself I have posted about. I'm not sure why you singled it out, but whatever.
Originally posted by AThousandYoung???? It's not an obsession -- this was my first impression of you: http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=69060&page=1. I know nothing about your theme, location, skin color, heritage, or anything else you may have posted, perhaps because it didn't particularly stand out. Had I had some sort of obsession, I'm sure I would have taken notes to better observe you as a well-rounded person. Or whatever.
Examples please? Recent ones especially.
The police have a duty to enforce the law, so it's tough to put this on them. My position is more that the citizens have no right to make anti-drug laws.
I suspect you're just obsessed with my marijuana use versus my atheism, or my nationality, my age, my education, my Shub-Niggurath theme, my location, ...[text shortened]... things about myself I have posted about. I'm not sure why you singled it out, but whatever.
Originally posted by rbmorrisi -love- salad dressing! green goddess, italian, bleu cheese, ranch ... i even put it on sandwiches!
anyone but yourself. Smoke crack, have gay unprotected sex, worship Satan...whatever. The problem I have is when people make something like pot smoking a central part of their identity. Plenty of people on this site smoke, but they do it quietly, on their own time. They think it's enjoyable, but it's not their identity. They don't brag about it any more than you would brag about using salad dressing.
.
2 edits
Originally posted by pawnhandlerYou didn't perhaps notice my references to inalienable rights, my location in Glendale and Los Angeles, my reference to the Declaration of Independence...
???? It's not an obsession -- this was my first impression of you: http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=69060&page=1. I know nothing about your theme, location, skin color, heritage, or anything else you may have posted, perhaps because it didn't particularly stand out. Had I had some sort of obsession, I'm sure I would have taken notes to better observe you as a well-rounded person. Or whatever.
You didn't pick up my location or nationality from that. You didn't pay attention to my argument, and weren't interested in discussing it whether you agreed or not. These things aren't important to you. You're not into your country or it's heritage. You aren't a philosophical type.
You didn't want to discuss the method I used for conveying my argument to the police.
Out of all that, what mattered to you was the marijuana, when the post was about the violation of inalienable rights in YOUR country - which is based on the belief in such rights.
You're not obsessed with me, you hate marijuana users for some reason and you think we should be ashamed of ourselves and hide the fact that we smoke bud. Well - deal with it. I looked at my post history and in no way do I feel I flaunt the fact that I smoke marijuana. If you feel I do, I think you're overly sensitive and I'm not going to worry about your strange little complex.
EDITS to add a sentence and fix grammar.