Originally posted by mikelomActual causes of hers and many other celebrity deaths are frequently camouflaged and infrequently ever known. Imagine the intent of this media accomodation is to protect their work and reputations from being tarnished and devalued in the public eye. Contrary to your conclusion, their passing will not be forgotten by their culturally impoverished generation. It's their identity. They're joined at the hip and lip by reason of vicarious adoption. Family, no matter what, is still family
Whitney's death soon forgotten within this year, and no further mention.
Shame, really.
I wonder who's the next infamous one to go, and to be forgotten soon after?
Barbra? Would she be forgotten as quickly as Whitney?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wB_vjpRhLxM
Or Celine, even though she is weaker....
-m.
... just like most all of us here, dangling by our mouse tails in cyberspace on a cloud named rhp. Thumbs up, Mikelom. Nice one.
-b.
22 Oct 12
Originally posted by mikelomThe next one to go will be Lady GaGa. She will wear another meat dress and wolves will get her.
Whitney's death soon forgotten within this year, and no further mention.
Shame, really.
I wonder who's the next infamous one to go, and to be forgotten soon after?
Barbra? Would she be forgotten as quickly as Whitney?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wB_vjpRhLxM
Or Celine, even though she is weaker....
-m.
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by zakkwylderNothing wrong with that genetically speaking. They were joined in marriage of their parents but have no genes in common so it is not like kissing cousins. They can have all the kids they want and have no more than the regular odds of having defective children.
Speaking of love, her daughter is wedding her step brother. So there's that.
So it is only in your eyes that something is wrong about that marriage.
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by sonhouseIf you didn't know, marrying your first cousin is still legal in Britain, and some states oF the US.
so it is not like kissing cousins. They can have all the kids they want and have no more than the regular odds of having defective children.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/theres-nothing-wrong-with-cousins-getting-married-scientists-say-1210072.html
-m. 😉
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by mikelomWe see the results if inbreeding in the several Hutterite colonies close to us. They are trying to marry from colonies in Canada or one of the other states now The most common affliction we have here is crossed eyes. There are only about three surnames amongst the colony members.
If you didn't know, marrying your first cousin is still legal in Britain, and some states oF the US.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/theres-nothing-wrong-with-cousins-getting-married-scientists-say-1210072.html
-m. 😉
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by ale1552You make interesting posts - are there only visual effects in these colonies?
We see the results if inbreeding in the several Hutterite colonies close to us. They are trying to marry from colonies in Canada or one of the other states now The most common affliction we have here is crossed eyes. There are only about three surnames amongst the colony members.