Go back
Immunity From Timeout While On Vacation

Immunity From Timeout While On Vacation

General

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sasquatch672
Shouldn't this, and your other thread, be in site ideas?
You're right. I just wanted to make sure as many people were aware of it as possible.

Regarding another issue in this thread, the only reason it is a subscriber-only vote is just to avoid the possible case of fake accounts placing votes.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just do away with holidays. πŸ˜›

I vote NO.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Moldy Crow
If you listen closely you can hear our piles bleeding for all of you.
I don't hear a thing except for the giant whooshing sound of subscribers moving to the melody of what the compitition is playing.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by adramforall
Just do away with holidays. πŸ˜›

I vote [b]NO
.[/b]
Then please go to the community votes section and vote no.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Chris
You're right. I just wanted to make sure as many people were aware of it as possible.

Regarding another issue in this thread, the only reason it is a subscriber-only vote is just to avoid the possible case of fake accounts placing votes.
If they are fake you should ban them.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cashthetrash
Then please go to the community votes section and vote no.
Been there, done that, got the T shirt.

πŸ˜‰

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by adramforall
Been there, done that, got the T shirt.

πŸ˜‰
You got a tee shirt?! All I got was this lousy key ringπŸ˜•πŸ˜ πŸ˜³

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Chris
I have put another vote up - [vid]13[/vid].

This is a simple Yes/No vote to decide if we need to make the vacation flag give immunity to timeouts.

The time that would be allowed to stay in vacation mode would be limited (if the vote comes out as a Yes, we will put up another vote on the time period), and I imagine it being about three or four weeks per year.
Yes, a vote is needed!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Chris
Regarding another issue in this thread, the only reason it is a subscriber-only vote is just to avoid the possible case of fake accounts placing votes.
There's more than one way to skin a cat.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
There's more than one way to skin a cat.
Yup, but tail to head is best. You can use its tail as a handle and with the added bonus that it can't scratch or bite your balls.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Chaswray
You got a tee shirt?! All I got was this lousy key ringπŸ˜•πŸ˜ πŸ˜³
That was no key ring if you got it out of the jar of vasoline.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
Subscribers will rejoice at the mass departure of us poor non-subs.:'(:'(:'(
No, we would rejoice at a massive influx of subscribers! You are not experiencing the best aspects of this site. Tournaments and more importantly Clans make this my 'one stop' chess adventure. Is it so expensive?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Chris, did you forget to show the current results of these votes or is this a blind vote?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Marinkatomb
No, we would rejoice at a massive influx of subscribers! You are not experiencing the best aspects of this site. Tournaments and more importantly Clans make this my 'one stop' chess adventure. Is it so expensive?
If someone wants to play lots of games, play in tournaments,clans and sieges, it is a fantastic reason to subscribe - and well worth it - I've actually recommended a couple of friends to do so.
But, for myself, who wishes to play just the 6 games currently allowed for free it makes sense for me to put up with the nags and adverts instead.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Marinkatomb
[b]Chris, did you forget to show the current results of these votes or is this a blind vote?[/b]
Just click on the 'view result' link on the right side of the screen to see the current voting.