Go back
inappropriate

inappropriate

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
What the Hell are you going on about? What 'bad guy' did I support? What thugs am I running with?

You better damn answer.

P-
Lol stop cussing at me, your Father wouldn't approve of your low intellect.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
Then so did Cribs.
I've never seen cribs or scribs write anything as vile as CIV did.

Evah!

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cashthetrash
Lol stop cussing at me, your Father wouldn't approve of your low intellect.
answer!~

Who
What
zah?!

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Raven69
True. That's the problem with offensive content, what one finds offensive another may not.
So as long as one solitary person doesn't find the content offensive no one else has a right to complain?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I've never seen cribs or scribs write anything as vile as CIV did.

Evah!

P-
I have. I've seen him write worse. And so have most of the rest of the people in this thread

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by darvlay
Stupid is a valid adjective to describe you.

I'll handle the name-calling, you vacuous nitwit.
That is about all you can handle. "Next insult coming right up with the fries, Mr. Ca$H "

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
That fails to explain why you think your opinion regarding what is "offensive" should be binding on this site when you admit that others have a completely different opinion.
I believe you were trying to say I was irrational. You were saying I was irrational, of something I thought racist in nature and offensive.

I have expressed my opinion on an issue. I see no reason to repeat myself. I expressed my opinion with the Admin, and they dealt with it, according to what they saw appropriate, what they considered appropriate action. They could have very well, explained to me, that they find nothing wrong with the avatar, according to the TOS.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cashthetrash
That is about all you can handle. "Next insult coming right up with the fries, Mr. Ca$H "
?

Do you even remember what we were discussing, Cash, or are you just shooting your mouth off now?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by darvlay
Does manning-up involve answering questions?
I'm sure you're an intelligent human being, and capable of answering that yourself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
That fails to explain why you think your opinion regarding what is "offensive" should be binding on this site when you admit that others have a completely different opinion.
Because there are still plenty that believes she is right. You got's that?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Elamef37
I believe you were trying to say I was irrational. You were saying I was irrational, of something I thought racist in nature and offensive.

I have expressed my opinion on an issue. I see no reason to repeat myself. I expressed my opinion with the Admin, and they dealt with it, according to what they saw appropriate, what they considered appropriate acti ...[text shortened]... very well, explained to me, that they find nothing wrong with the avatar, according to the TOS.
I should warn you the logic and reason don't work on defrauder.

he is impervious to both.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Elamef37
You and I are two different people.

What you percieve is irrationality could be poles apart from what I deem irrational. No two people are alike.
for what it's worth, you seem quite reasonable. you two just aren't talking about the same thing. you're talking about your right to get upset about a picture of a black man in chains, which nobody denies, and he's talking about how your personal reasoning (at least so far) has nothing to do with whether the person with the avatar is guilty of racist behaviour. or that's at least about how I've understood you both.

and palynka is saying people like you wouldn't get hurt if people didn't insist on having 'problematic' avatars just because they're logically right about it. which is also about where I stand personally, although I can't not defend the logical side of it as well.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
So as long as one solitary person doesn't find the content offensive no one else has a right to complain?
No, everyone has the right to complain. What I meant was is that often what should constitute as offensive is subjective.


Although there are cases where it is pretty clear something is offensive...like calling someone a n-lover for example.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Raven69
like calling someone a n-lover for example.
Isn't that the reason Clayton Bigsby divorced his wife?

LOL 😵

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Elamef37
I'm sure you're an intelligent human being, and capable of answering that yourself.
That's correct. I am. The answer is yes. So man up yourself and answer mine.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.