Go back
Interview with Red Night

Interview with Red Night

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Was he warned?
Temporary bans ARE warnings.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
"Duh" is certainly an appropriate word to use in this post but I think it should come at the beginning.

Being "unaware racist" is also insufficient to warrant punishment.
This is true particularly when dealing with the PC brigade, wherein one cannot know what terms are going to be crowned "racist" from one day to the next.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Temporary bans ARE warnings.
Hi Phlabynka.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Because it's a reminder to be more aware.

Do you need more spelling out for you?
That type of reasoning is worthy of the Marquis De Sade. If someone is unaware that they are doing anything wrong, then punishing them for doing it is simple cruelty.

Yes, some actually spelling out of the "reasoning" behind your positions might be helpful in a forum.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Temporary bans ARE warnings.
Orwell would be proud.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
That type of reasoning is worthy of the Marquis De Sade.
Well done, palynka!

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
That type of reasoning is worthy of the Marquis De Sade. If someone is unaware that they are doing anything wrong, then punishing them for doing it is simple cruelty.

Yes, some actually spelling out of the "reasoning" behind your positions might be helpful in a forum.
Did you knowingly choose not to address the reason I've mentioned for that "punishment"?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Orwell would be proud.
Another vacuous statement. As usual.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Did you knowingly choose not to address the reason I've mentioned for that punishment?
I didn't think you were serious. "A reminder to be more aware"?????? How exactly does that work? Must kirksey and the rest of us try to determine the lowest common denominator of what might possibly offend someone somewhere and not post anything above such a standard? That sounds like a call for the return of the good ole days of the Sesame Street Squad.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Another vacuous statement. As usual.
Perhaps you haven't read 1984. Pick it up some day.

A beheading is a "warning" too but that doesn't mean it is justified.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
I didn't think you were serious. "A reminder to be more aware"?????? How exactly does that work? Must kirksey and the rest of us try to determine the lowest common denominator of what might possibly offend someone somewhere and not post anything above such a standard? That sounds like a call for the return of the good ole days of the Sesame Street Squad.
Slippery slope argument.

By being banned temporarily Kirksey was told that he stepped over the line. Whether he is able to learn from this is up to him.

I take it from your post that you admit you're incapable of learning from this apparently 'new' (to you) piece of information.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Perhaps you haven't read 1984. Pick it up some day.

A beheading is a "warning" too but that doesn't mean it is justified.
More empty statements.

A beheading is a "warning" too but that doesn't mean it is justified.

Can you conclude from that no warning is justified? No.
Did I say all forms of warning were justified? No.

Can you say something that is actually relevant for the discussion?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Slippery slope argument.

By being banned temporarily Kirksey was told that he stepped over the line. Whether he is able to learn from this is up to him.

I take it from your post that you admit you're incapable of learning from this apparently 'new' (to you) piece of information.
There is no "line", at least one that any of us can reasonably rely on. Kirksey used a term with an accepted meaning in a context where that meaning was correct. However, he was banned because in a different context the term MIGHT be a racial slur directed at a minority group.

I have no idea what can be "learned" from this except that there are a lot of thin skinned morons like yourself. Red Night and some of the mods willing to punish people for non-existent transgressions.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
More empty statements.

[b]A beheading is a "warning" too but that doesn't mean it is justified.


Can you conclude from that no warning is justified? No.
Did I say all forms of warning were justified? No.

Can you say something that is actually relevant for the discussion?[/b]
You haven't said anything of substance. Indeed, you seem incapable of doing so.

I have no more time to waste with you.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Slippery slope argument.

By being banned temporarily Kirksey was told that he stepped over the line.
Slope is a very offensive term.

It is my understanding that Kirksey can read. Perhaps a PM from the moderator would have a been a more just method of telling him that he stepped over the line.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.