Go back
Last gasp of the rise of white supremacists

Last gasp of the rise of white supremacists

General




Originally posted by Captain Strange
The Democrats have had 8 years to repeal the laws he used to avoid paying taxes and declare bankruptcy.
But of course there is no chance of that because they are in bed with Wall Street.
Hillary was paid $700,000 for one speech to Goldman Sachs.
CS,
Trump of course is a saint with a Halo who hasn't done anything wrong.... ( Note Sarcasm intended).

-VR


Originally posted by Captain Strange
The Democrats have had 8 years to repeal the laws he used to avoid paying taxes and declare bankruptcy.
But of course there is no chance of that because they are in bed with Wall Street.
Hillary was paid $700,000 for one speech to Goldman Sachs.
Ah, you mean you figure since they are democrats they should have been able to force legislation through congress and the house. In a republican nation. Good luck with that. I didn't see any republican bills trying to change things either. Gee, wonder why.


Originally posted by sonhouse
Ah, you mean you figure since they are democrats they should have been able to force legislation through congress and the house. In a republican nation. Good luck with that. I didn't see any republican bills trying to change things either. Gee, wonder why.
Would you hurt someone who paid you $700,000 for a 20 minute speech.


Originally posted by Captain Strange
Would you hurt someone who paid you $700,000 for a 20 minute speech.
In other words, Republicans were bought out.


Originally posted by lemon lime
More than a few were turned off by this sort of rhetoric, and it was because of this many decided to vote for Trump. Democrats are at least partially responsible for Trumps victory by insulting the intelligence and character of roughly half the people in the U.S. Not a particularly smart thing to do if they were truly serious about winning the election.
Suzianne's ugly rhetoric is just as ugly as the rhetoric I heard from some Trump supporters. American political discourse has been dragged into a deep dark hole. And - judging by here behaviour on this forum - she is part of that problem.

1 edit

Originally posted by sonhouse
Ah, you mean you figure since they are democrats they should have been able to force legislation through congress and the house. In a republican nation. Good luck with that. I didn't see any republican bills trying to change things either. Gee, wonder why.
Shurely you must know King Obama could have done that all by himself by simply issuing an executive order.


Originally posted by lemon lime
Shurely you must know King Obama could have done that all by himself by simply issuing an executive order.
Right. And don't call me Shurely.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
Right. And don't call me Shurely.
Sonhouse,

Perhaps he just miss spelled surely!

-VR

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Sonhouse,

Perhaps he just miss spelled surely!

-VR
No, sonhouse got it right. I misspelled Shirley.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lemon lime
No, sonhouse got it right. I misspelled Shirley.
LOL....OK, then I got it not exactly right.

-VR


Originally posted by FMF
Suzianne's ugly rhetoric is just as ugly as the rhetoric I heard from some Trump supporters. American political discourse has been dragged into a deep dark hole. And - judging by here behaviour on this forum - she is part of that problem.
Meanwhile, your M.O. matches up with Trump himself.

Mean tweets against those who dare to disagree with you, while you show fawning approval of those who suck up to you, nevermind their own hidden agendas. Their agreement level with you is the only bar you measure others against, just so you can deem them "Sad!" or "smart". The difference between you and him, of course, is that no one listens to you.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
Meanwhile, your M.O. matches up with Trump himself.

Mean tweets against those who dare to disagree with you, while you show fawning approval of those who suck up to you, nevermind their own hidden agendas. Their agreement level with you is the only bar you measure others against, just so you can deem them "Sad!" or "smart". The difference between you and him, of course, is that no one listens to you.
So the question seems to be, who would make a better president, Trump or FMF?


Originally posted by sonhouse
So the question seems to be, who would make a better president, Trump or FMF?
Sonhouse,
You make the answer too easy. Neither would make a better president.

Regards,
-VR