It depends upon which side of 'usury' you are, doesn't it?
Or does it?
Disconnection from usury would be removing the 'money' dependance, and love would surely replace that? Not!
Love can contain usury too!
So, self-abaitment.... removal of both - does that lead to happiness, or is it assumed one or t'other of money or love are successful in measuring happiness?
-m. π
Originally posted by mikelomMIike, isn't 'usury' usually the charging of interest at exorbitant rates to strangers?
It depends upon which side of 'usury' you are, doesn't it?
Or does it?
Disconnection from usury would be removing the 'money' dependance, and love would surely replace that? Not!
Love can contain usury too!
So, self-abaitment.... removal of both - does that lead to happiness, or is it assumed one or t'other of money or love are successful in measuring happiness?
-m. π
Originally posted by Maxwell SmartGood point. But the question meant, what to shoot for. Of course we chase money. But would you rather fall deeper in debt while chasing your dream, or get rich while hating every minute.
The original question makes the presumptive error that you can't have both.
You can.
Originally posted by apathistWhich is why I brought up 'usury'. c.f. The Merchant of Venice, and Bassanio's pursuit of love, at the potential cost of Antonio. Deeper into debt, for pursuing love?
Good point. But the question meant, what to shoot for. Of course we chase money. But would you rather fall deeper in debt while chasing your dream, or get rich while hating every minute.
-m. π