Go back
new here...

new here...

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wildfire
Exactly. After the American Revolution, the Americans wanted nothing to do with the British. Therefore, they changed everything that could possibly remind them of British rule, including language.
Thats one perspective

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Vladamir no1
Thats one perspective
No, that's the historically accepted theory.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wildfire
Therefore, they changed everything that could possibly remind them of British rule, including language.
Yet they were too lazy to invent a new one.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
Yet they were too lazy to invent a new one.
You know, whether the spelling is color or colour, I dare say every reader knows damn well what you mean. So why in the name of Webster do you have to be such an ass that you bring it up every single bloody time it happens? I'll tell you, Mr. Bowmann... the biggest beef I have with you is that you focus on the inconsequential (misspellings and missteps in grammar) instead of focusing on the ideas being presented. Let it go, man! It's a fact of life that people will screw up from time to time, but it does not mean their idea is invalid just because they mispell a word, or because they use their own country's spelling of the word! Imagine how life would be if you had some little twit following you around incessantly pointing out and correcting your mistakes? How long would it be before you had had enough? What I find completely baffling is why people here tolerate, and even encourage this asinine behavior. If you are indeed as smart as you (and your fans) keep telling us, I would have thought you would have dropped this nonsensical behavior long ago. I know I would certainly have more respect for someone who conversed like a human, instead of someone who acts like an ass all the time.

Ok, soapbox mode off...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
You know, whether the spelling is color or colour, I dare say every reader knows damn well what you mean. So why in the name of Webster do you have to be such an ass that you bring it up [b]every single bloody time it happens? I'll tell you, Mr. Bowmann... the biggest beef I have with you is that you focus on the inconsequential (misspellings and mis ...[text shortened]... d like a human, instead of someone who acts like an ass all the time.

Ok, soapbox mode off...[/b]
There's nothing 'inconsequential' about "the thin end of the wedge." America wants to rule the world, politically and economically. We all know that.

As an American, you either don't care about this or you're bafflingly ignorant of it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
There's nothing 'inconsequential' about "the thin end of the wedge." America wants to rule the world, politically and economically. We all know that.

As an American, you either don't care about this or you're bafflingly ignorant of it.
Trust me, I don't like my current government any better than you do.

It's the country I love. I only hate the people currently running it.

And it IS inconsequential when you quote each and every instance of an American spelling for a word and then follow it with the British spelling. NO ONE CARES.

You would be better advised to respond to the ideas in the message you quote instead of the spelling and/or grammar. It's also eminently more respectful. You don't make friends in this world by being an ass and dissing everyone.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
You know, whether the spelling is color or colour, I dare say every reader knows damn well what you mean. So why in the name of Webster do you have to be such an ass that you bring it up [b]every single bloody time it happens? I'll tell you, Mr. Bowmann... the biggest beef I have with you is that you focus on the inconsequential (misspellings and mis ...[text shortened]... d like a human, instead of someone who acts like an ass all the time.

Ok, soapbox mode off...[/b]
Believe me, there was a time when people fought against Bowmann and all he stands for, but as time wore on, it became kind of meaningless struggle. If you can imagine Bowmann being an annoying 5 year old, then it becomes easier to put up with his behavior.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
And it [b]IS inconsequential when you quote each and every instance of an American spelling for a word and then follow it with the British spelling. NO ONE CARES.

You would be better advised to respond to the ideas in the message you quote instead of the spelling and/or grammar. It's also eminently more respectful. You don't make friends in this world by being an ass and dissing everyone.[/b]
Quite a lot of people DO CARE. You're a typical American with a typical American attitude.

Respond to IDEAS? In the General forum? LOL!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wildfire
set1 ( P ) Pronunciation Key (st)
v. set, set·ting, sets
v. tr.
To put in a specified position; place: set a book on a table.
To put into a specified state: set the prisoner at liberty.

To put into a stable position: set the fence post into a bed of concrete.
To fix firmly or in an immobile manner: He set his jaw and concentrated on flying ...[text shortened]... r cutting that is ready for planting.
The act of arranging hair by waving and curling it. 😛😀
Oh brother....I see you have nothing else to do, huh?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TRAINS44
Oh brother....I see you have nothing else to do, huh?
I simply provided bowmann with an answer to his question. That's all there is to it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ravello
Oh,I thought it was Bowmann talking.
His breath smells worse.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by GalaxyShield
Sorry to hear that.....Quickly, quickly! Leave! Quickly! For your own good.
Mr. Galaxy Shield That is no way to welcome a gorgeous, luscious, delicious, girl, here.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wildfire
I simply provided bowmann with an answer to his question. That's all there is to it.
Bowmann....With a capital "B".

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TRAINS44
Bowmann....With a capital "B".
No, when he's acting like an idiot, bowmann gets demoted to a lower case 'b'.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
Although it is painful, I have to agree with Bowmann on this matter.

You see, it starts by misspelling words: Humor instead of humour, for example. But it generally ends up with freaks like George Bush pronouncing beautiful words like nuclear as NOO Cler.

Yes, languages change as does everything else with time. But as evolution suggests, things are ...[text shortened]... et me wrong though, what the Cockney types do with English should be a shooting offense as well.
How come speling is so fukin important on this forum?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.