1 edit
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveLike what we get on PlayChess. See a few screenshots here http://www.chesshouse.com/fritz_10_chess_software_review_part_2.asp
What changes would you like to see?
Apart from rated games.
- kibbitz games e.g watch the top rated players slugging it out.
- rated challenges
- a C client is better than a Macromedia Flash interface. I understand the source for ICC/FICS is available for free so something along those lines is better than an applet type thingy. It is too much like Yahoo now the way it is.
Originally posted by z00tI would like to see something that tells you when, or how long ago a game was started.
Like what we get on PlayChess. See a few screenshots here http://www.chesshouse.com/fritz_10_chess_software_review_part_2.asp
- kibbitz games e.g watch the top rated players slugging it out.
- rated challenges
- a C client is better than a Macromedia Flash interface. I understand the source for ICC/FICS is available for free so something along those lines is better than an applet type thingy. It is too much like Yahoo now the way it is.
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitMoney is not the issue. If RHP Blitz as a product is not comparable to what is out there, then something is wrong somewhere. Even though FICS is free and there is Yahoo Chess for 1500 level players, PlayChess is worth every cent.
Translation:
I want something more for free, and now!
Some say ICC is good but it looks to me like Winboard with some bells and whistles.
Originally posted by z00tIf money is not an issue, pay up.
Money is not the issue. If RHP Blitz as a product is not comparable to what is out there, then something is wrong somewhere. Even though FICS is free and there is Yahoo Chess for 1500 level players, PlayChess is worth every cent.
Some say ICC is good but it looks to me like Winboard with some bells and whistles.
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitI have just won a simul over a GM on PlayChess. I'm a live chess sort of person and I struggle to even play all 6 of my available slots. Even if I subscribed I would not play more than a handful of CC games? Is it worth subscribing in my case?
If money is not an issue, pay up.
P-
I can see how having 30, 50 or even a hundred games going appeals to some folk but I haven't got that time on my hands.
1 edit
Originally posted by z00tHead over to site announcements and site ideas. If you spend any amount of time in those forums you'll realise Russ has a to-do list as long as my p... *ahem* arms, and he also does work away from RHP (to provide an altaernative income which I guess ultimately keeps costs down for us the subscribers).
I just clicked on the RHP blitz and it looks like there is no change from when it was introduced. Or does any of you see any changes?
So quit whinging and be thankful for what this site offers already.
P.s. If you want to see how long my arms are, check out rhpfaces.
Originally posted by z00tthen don't let the door hit you in the butt on the way out.
I have just won a simul over a GM on PlayChess. I'm a live chess sort of person and I struggle to even play all 6 of my available slots. Even if I subscribed I would not play more than a handful of CC games? Is it worth subscribing in my case?
I can see how having 30, 50 or even a hundred games going appeals to some folk but I haven't got that time on my hands.
why do people constantly try to make this site about live chess when it is clearly a correspondence site? the blitz chess thing was just a simple add-on to give a little something different. it's not, and never will be, what this site is about.
you think PlayChess is so cool? then go, knock yourself out. just don't try to make this site into it.
