Go back
Please dont accept challenges then delete the g...

Please dont accept challenges then delete the g...

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

If being "legal" equated with being "OK" then we wouldnt have laws in the first place. If rape were not yet criminalised would it be ok? So the defence of "The site allows it therefore its ok" doesnt really stand up; the fact that Russ is planning a fix is further evidence!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Theoryhack
If being "legal" equated with being "OK" then we wouldnt have laws in the first place. If rape were not yet criminalised would it be ok? So the defence of "The site allows it therefore its ok" doesnt really stand up; the fact that Russ is planning a fix is further evidence!
Deleting chess games = rape? 😕

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Theoryhack
If being "legal" equated with being "OK" then we wouldnt have laws in the first place. If rape were not yet criminalised would it be ok? So the defence of "The site allows it therefore its ok" doesnt really stand up; the fact that Russ is planning a fix is further evidence!
The thing is that it's hard to know "why" they deleted them.

And consider that you are still a provisional. There are many people that sign on to the site, start a few games to see how it goes and then proceed to disappear without a trace without finishing them. If you have an open invite and then don't play, they may still decide it's not worth the risk of waiting to see if you are still there or not, so they delete it if you are not moving. There may be many reasons why they deleted them, some may be valid to you and others are not.

In conclusion: just let it go. Awareness has been raised, a solution is on its way, let's wait and see if it is a good one or not.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Theoryhack
...the fact that Russ is planning a fix is further evidence!
Many things still need fixing on this site. Two in particular that stand out are forum-related.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
Many things still need fixing on this site. Two in particular that stand out are forum-related.
What might they be Bo bo?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
Many things still need fixing on this site. Two in particular that stand out are forum-related.
Hear! Hear!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
Hear! Hear!
I think he may have been talking about you dude. 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jimslyp69
What might they be Bo bo?
They're really quite obvious.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
I suspect it wasn't made a feature for the purpose of timewasting but more probably for when the opponent was not moving. Whatever, I consider the feature is often abused. But that's just my opinion. 😛
If it was made for the purpose of when the opponent was not moving, then what is the scull for. I think you are confused.

But I will go with your latter statement, that in some cases it probably is abused. Now that part should be fixed. I could see how someone could potentially go and delete every challenge just for the heck of it. But that is something totally different. Let's see what Russ comes up with. The Monkey man, does some pretty slick stuff. Whatever his choice is I will support.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
They're really quite obvious.
Not to the untrained eye. Pray do tell.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jimslyp69
Not to the untrained eye. Pray do tell.
OK. Find a post of mine in which I crudely describe how I had sex with your mother.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
OK. Find a post of mine in which I crudely describe how I had sex with your mother.
Was it recent?
The post!!!! 😠

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jimslyp69
Was it recent?
Next, point to the post in question. That is, to the exact position on the page of the thread concerned.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
Next, point to the post in question. That is, to the exact position on the page of the thread concerned.
Are you trying to point out that you can't cross reference searches by author and the text contained within them?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jimslyp69
Are you trying to point out that you can't cross reference searches by author and the text contained within them?
I'm pointing out that the forums need an internal search engine.