Question of the day

@Suzianne said
Wow, I turned 11 in 1987.

I turned 14. - Gave up meat a year earlier.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
I turned 14. - Gave up meat a year earlier.

I turned 41. Hey that’s your age at the time, reversed. I gave up🤔 oh right…nothing.

@Trev333 said
[poll]C57267AE17DE80DC5BF6D63FF125BBDF[/poll]

@Trev333,

I am sure everyone is as interested as I am in knowing the answer!!! 🤔


-VR

@Very-Rusty said
@Trev333,

I am sure everyone is as interested as I am in knowing the answer!!! 🤔


-VR

I think most people would have read the answer on the previous page.

It was a badger.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
I think most people would have read the answer on the previous page.

It was a badger.

@Ghost,

As you are probably aware I am not like EVERYONE ELSE!!!!

I just answered the first post, my main object on here is to play chess, secondly I do check the forums from time to time, but don't go through every single thing in the thread, just not that interested. 😉

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
@Ghost,

As you are probably aware I am not like EVERYONE ELSE!!!!

I just answered the first post, my main object on here is to play chess, secondly I do check the forums from time to time, but don't go through every single thing in the thread, just not that interested. 😉

-VR

Hence why you often get the wrong end of the stick.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Hence why you often get the wrong end of the stick.

@Ghost,

You are certainly entitled to your own opinion, but not always right for sure!!!

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
@Ghost,

You are certainly entitled to your own opinion, but not always right for sure!!!

-VR

It is just simple logic.

If you are about to make a chess move and haven't considered the moves that came before it or the moves that could follow, you'll likely blunder a piece.

Likewise, if you respond to a post without regard to what came before or after, you are likely to blunder in your understanding of what is being discussed.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
It is just simple logic.

If you are about to make a chess move and haven't considered the moves that came before it or the moves that could follow, you'll likely blunder a piece.

Likewise, if you respond to a post without regard to what came before or after, you are likely to blunder in your understanding of what is being discussed.

@Ghost,

Very strange you would compare chess to a forum that is just chatter.

I believe you just like to be disagreeable as much as you can without looking bad in the process, which most often fails for you.

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
@Ghost,

Very strange you would compare chess to a forum that is just chatter.

-VR

The same logic applies.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
The same logic applies.

@Ghost,

You are just being silly now.

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
@Ghost,

You are just being silly now.

-VR

Hey, you're the chap who has an issue with basic logic.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Hey, you're the chap who has an issue with basic logic.

@Ghost,

Again just being silly you are, do you think you are funny??

I don't know why I even bother you can just be a waste of time.

-VR

@Very-Rusty said
@Ghost,

Again just being silly you are, do you think you are funny??

I don't know why I even bother you can just be a waste of time.

-VR

Agreed sir. Back away from logic. It is not your friend.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Agreed sir. Back away from logic. It is not your friend.

Logic and you can take a long walk off a short Pier. 😛

-VR