Originally posted by Angry BoyWelcome to the forums.
Section 3(a) : The Red Hot Pawn administration team have identified a single person using multiple accounts.
What has the question got to do with multiple accounts? I'm talking from a clan challenge perspective here. I was just wondering whether it would work out beneficial to win either the first or the second game or whether you'd end up with the same ...[text shortened]... y. Somehow from that you have implied that I have already broken a rule. What's your problem?
This, unfortunately, is the status quo here. Belittling new (well, relatively new) posters is part of that. When they see another monkey striving for the banana, they'll try to beat him senseless. It's not that they want the banana for themselves, it's just that they enjoy beating on the other monkeys.
And if everyone here posted a list of their problems, you wouldn't have time to read them all.
If they don't answer your question, just assume they don't know and move on. Just don't let them bait you, because that is what they want. Your original topic means nothing to them, but they'll still try to divert your attention from it. Eventually, someone with the knowledge you seek will answer, unless they get bored and wander off first.
Forum trolls... can't live with them and you can't shoot them. 😞
Originally posted by Sicilian SmaugIt seems that you're right!
Probably best to lose first, then win. Might end up 1 point better off that way.
After some maths (meaning googling for a maths website that works these things out for you!) I found that 2 players starting on 1300 would end up as 1299 (player A) and 1301 (player B).
Meaning there's a slight advantage to be had by losing then winning over winning then losing.