2 edits
Theoretical situation on RHP
Two player's (A & B) have identical ratings and play a match with player A winning. During that time neither has completed a game with anyone else so their ratings are unchanged until the result of their game. So, player A's rating climbs, B's falls.
The two play again immediately. This time player B wins and again neither player completes a game with anyone else so their ratings are unchanged until the result of their second game. So, player B's rating climbs, A's falls.
Which player now has the highest rating?
Originally posted by Angry Boyare you a padder?
Theoretical situation on RHP
Two player's (A & B) have identical ratings and play a match with player A winning. During that time neither has completed a game with anyone one else so their ratings are unchanged until the result of their game. So, player A's rating climbs, B's falls.
The two play again immediately. This time player B wins and again ne ...[text shortened]... game. So, player B's rating climbs, A's falls.
Which player now has the highest rating?
1 edit
Originally posted by Angry Boyi have a solution. use your (a) account to beat your (b) account (just resign with b it is much quicker. then use your b account to beat your a account, and see which rating is higher.
Theoretical situation on RHP
Two player's (A & B) have identical ratings and play a match with player A winning. During that time neither has completed a game with anyone else so their ratings are unchanged until the result of their game. So, player A's rating climbs, B's falls.
The two play again immediately. This time player B wins and again neithe ...[text shortened]... game. So, player B's rating climbs, A's falls.
Which player now has the highest rating?
Edit: do you know what a 3(a) is?
Originally posted by Angry Boyhttp://www.redhotpawn.com/help/index.php?help=faq
Theoretical situation on RHP
Two player's (A & B) have identical ratings and play a match with player A winning. During that time neither has completed a game with anyone else so their ratings are unchanged until the result of their game. So, player A's rating climbs, B's falls.
The two play again immediately. This time player B wins and again neithe ...[text shortened]... game. So, player B's rating climbs, A's falls.
Which player now has the highest rating?
Will allow you to work out the answer which will depend on how many games the players have previously played.
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomSection 3(a) : The Red Hot Pawn administration team have identified a single person using multiple accounts.
i have a solution. use your (a) account to beat your (b) account (just resign with b it is much quicker. then use your b account to beat your a account, and see which rating is higher.
Edit: do you know what a 3(a) is?
What has the question got to do with multiple accounts? I'm talking from a clan challenge perspective here. I was just wondering whether it would work out beneficial to win either the first or the second game or whether you'd end up with the same rating either way. Somehow from that you have implied that I have already broken a rule. What's your problem?
1 edit
Originally posted by Angry Boyits ok, im an ex-padder my self, youre in the denial stage.
Section 3(a) : The Red Hot Pawn administration team have identified a single person using multiple accounts.
What has the question got to do with multiple accounts? I'm talking from a clan challenge perspective here. I was just wondering whether it would work out beneficial to win either the first or the second game or whether you'd end up with the same ...[text shortened]... y. Somehow from that you have implied that I have already broken a rule. What's your problem?
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomI still haven't got a clue what you're jabbering on about but like I said earlier it's probably hilarious. I won't be forgetting that you have effectively called me a cheat for asking a question that you didn't / couldn't answer. Cheerio for now.
its ok, im an ex-padder my self, youre in the denial stage.