Originally posted by cashthetrashHere's a direct quote from katty (from page 55 of her postings):
Humm, that is interesting. I just did a search for Katty in the find Player. I didn't see anything like what Gavin described. It may be true, but then I only read a couple of pages. All I could see was a young girl being bullied as I expected by the same old bunch.
"as you know saudi arabia is a very strict country they dont allow mixing for arabs! meaning arab guys and girls communicating! its very strict! arab guys cant go out with arab girls, if they go out they have to be very careful! now talking about saudies! they're the worst people you'd ever find.. breifly all saudies turned gay! and its really really disgusting, they cant get a gurl so they have no choice but to turn gay!and these guys become so horny that they do it anywhere! and to me its soo disgusting! imagine u see this infront of your eyes! it makes me throw up!"
Originally posted by XanthosNZThis debate shouldn't center around the use of the proverbial 7 dirty words. Particulary, if you can still use those words by subsituting a * or a @ for a vowel. (And don't post back and tell me there are more than 7. That's not the point.)
I said I have only sworn once in the public forums.
You can still say some pretty vulgar and offensive things without using prohibited words.
You did. You called a member of the RHP community some pretty vulgar and disgusting names. You went beyond the bounds of human decency and then had the audacity to whine that I was calling you by your first name.
I apologized to you for calling you by your first name and you can't apologize for calling someone names that were obviously beyond the bounds of reason?
Anyone else would have gotten a ban for what you said.
You didn't. I'm beginning to see how the system works here and it stinks!!
And as for your lame response that your mother can take care of herself. All that tells me is that you found the question so offensive that you didn't even want to think about it.
Originally posted by Red NightRuss has previously stated that obfusticating swearwords is not any better than using them normally.
This debate shouldn't center around the use of the proverbial 7 dirty words. Particulary, if you can still use those words by subsituting a * or a @ for a vowel. (And don't post back and tell me there are more than 7. That's not the point.)
You can still say some pretty vulgar and offensive things without using prohibited words.
You did. You call ...[text shortened]... is that you found the question so offensive that you didn't even want to think about it.
And the key part is where you say "Anyone else would have gotten a ban for what you said.". What evidence do you have of that? Do you know of someone who was banned for similar? Surely you know where the burden of proof must lie when making accusations of corruption?
Originally posted by XanthosNZThat debate is going on in the debate forum where a lot of other people are making the same accusation.
Russ has previously stated that obfusticating swearwords is not any better than using them normally.
And the key part is where you say "Anyone else would have gotten a ban for what you said.". What evidence do you have of that? Do you know of someone who was banned for similar? Surely you know where the burden of proof must lie when making accusations of corruption?
Anyway, using your approach, I could always just say it was a joke.
Like that great joke you told about Baby-lon or the other one about your countries greatest (only) hero being a homicidal homophobe (or were you just projecting?)