Originally posted by robbie carrobieBUMP for robbie (from page 8)... You still remember pleasant and civil PMs which saw us sharing some music we'd made and you still remember how I helped you track down some folk music you were interested in, and you've stated pretty clearly that you cannot remember any "unsavoury correspondence" between us by PM of any kind ~ nor at any time in the past ~ and yet you can, nevertheless, see fit to say [of me] "he's been blocked since I cannot remember when. Corresponding with FMF in public is hazardous enough, in private is just downright asking for it as you have found out to your chagrin". I think you have somewhat of a deficit in the common decency department, robbie.
Simply because I cannot recall what the nature of any unsavoury correspondence which might have transpired doesn't mean that it did not exist or that I have fabricated its existence, it simply means that I cannot recall it.
Originally posted by FMFWhat about it Judas?
BUMP for robbie (from page 8)... You still remember pleasant and civil PMs which saw us sharing some music we'd made and you still remember how I helped you track down some folk music you were interested in, and you've stated pretty clearly that you cannot remember any "unsavoury correspondence" between us by PM of any kind ~ nor at any time in the past ~ and ye ...[text shortened]... r chagrin". I think you have somewhat of a deficit in the common decency department, robbie.[/b]
Originally posted by Suziannerobbie has been alluding to how you have been humiliated by this incident or perhaps to how I have been trying to humiliate you. Why don't you just publish your PM in public and therefore reveal this supposed "heinous betrayal of trust" that has been mentioned?
Congratulations on the single biggest 'dick move' ever on this site (and yes, there are others that didn't quite rise to this level), but I had already sussed out that you are a disgusting human being.
Originally posted by FMFFMF,
robbie has been alluding to how you have been humiliated by this incident or perhaps to how I have been trying to humiliate you. Why don't you just publish your PM in public and therefore reveal this supposed "heinous betrayal of trust" that has been mentioned?
I guess you don't remember GB getting a forum ban for doing that very thing do you?
-VR
Thanks, Rusty, for returning this pathetic circus back to the point.
So, who else is letting the star die? This is what you get, folks. Right
here in this thread, your cash put into good use for the healthy, good
fun of the general forum.
P.S. And remember, boys and girls, if you get a supposedly abusive
message, shrug it off, man up, or report it to the site. No need to be a
vindictive bee-atch and make a freakin' show out of it. Have some
class, mmkay?
Originally posted by FMFPerhaps a lengthy forum ban might make you think twice before revealing a confidentiality again?
If he showed an abusive and threatening PM to his friends then I believe he was well within his rights. There is no perverted 'right to secrecy' for abusive people.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat "confidentiality"? There is only a "confidentiality" issue if you believe abusers have a right to keep their abusive behaviour confidential and those they abuse have an obligation to cooperate in keeping the abuse confidential. Is that what you believe?
Perhaps a lengthy forum ban might make you think twice before revealing a confidentiality again?
Originally posted by wolfgang59I'm a subscriber and if I want to send a message to someone, I click on MESSAGE on their profile page, which brings up a "Send Message" box, and there's a note above the the SEND icon which says "Please refrain from sending any messages that may be considered abusive by the recipient. Failing to do so may result in the termination of your account."
Are the "Private Message" and "Confidential Message" options only available to subs?
I only have the option to message someone.