Originally posted by Very RustyI'm not looking for anything from you, as it happens. However, if you do have any kind of argument at all to offer about the 'right to confidentiality' that an abuser supposedly has and whether the targets of abuse can be said to have an obligation to cooperate in keeping the abuse secret, then that might be interesting.
You just run around looking for sympathy from people, some are suckers enough to buy it, I'll pass on it personally!!!
Originally posted by FMFFMF,
I'm not looking for anything from you, as it happens. However, if you do have any kind of argument at all to offer about the 'right to confidentiality' that an abuser supposedly has and whether the targets of abuse can be said to have an obligation to cooperate in keeping the abuse secret, then that might be interesting.
No one said anything about hiding it. What I said: was that you do it throught the proper channels, being Administration. NOT YOUR WAY!!!
-VR
Originally posted by Very RustyRusty,
vespin,
WE STRONGLY disagree about this....!!! You should grow up become a man, learn to take your bumps and bruises in life.
-VR
Hate to take this off-topic, but really? VESPIN and FMF are of different backgrounds and live in different countries in different parts of the world. They really are, I know the real people behind both names.
1 edit
Originally posted by Very RustyAint that the truth, he had options open to him. To simply block the sender, to appeal to the site administration and yet he choose the most loathsome of all, to share the private correspondence with his cronies in order to humiliate the sender. Why else would he choose to do so? This action speaks volumes about the kind of untrustworthy, forked tongued, two faced character that he self evidently purports to be. Trust him at your peril.
FMF,
You seem to have selective memory or perhaps you were at deaths door at that point in time. You do have an obligation to keep Private Messages private. As I told you if you have a problem with them thinking they are abusive then take the proper steps and inform Administration. They can then look at the conversations between you and the pers ...[text shortened]... ds, and decide.
No, you would rather be a big cry baby about it, in my humble opinion.
-VR
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOn the contrary. No deceit. All out in the open. Nobody's shabby secrets being kept. No curtailment of free speech. Principled stand. Suzianne gets no ban. She's learnt a lesson. Other abusive posters like yourself are vowing not to send any abusive messages for fear of being exposed. No cover up. Channel of communication still open. Decent messaging still possible. A very satisfying set of outcomes.
Aint that the truth, he had options open to him. To simply block the sender, to appeal to the site administration and yet he choose the most loathsome of all, to share the private correspondence with his cronies in order to humiliate the sender. Why else would he choose to do so? This action speaks volumes about the kind of untrustworthy, forked tongued, two faced character that he self evidently purports to be. Trust him at your peril.