Go back
Sarcasm Thread

Sarcasm Thread

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by demonseed
I might but I don't see how this comment is relevant to our interchange.
Isn't that ironic?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Isn't that ironic?
No.

1. You intimated that I was, self-proclaimed, intelligent.

2. I pointed out that no self-proclamation was made.

3. You pointed out that intelligence is relative.

4. I failed to see the relevancy.

I don't find this ironic, more kinda random.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by demonseed
3. You pointed out that intelligence is random.
I pointed out that intelligence was random or was that a random statement from your part?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Suddenly this is the Irony Thread?

Now that's spastic sarcasm at its finest!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
I pointed out that intelligence was random or was that a random statement from your part?
Thanks, duly edited.

Vote Up
Vote Down

This was missing:

0. You accused Serendipity of a low IQ

Originally posted by demonseed

1. You intimated that I was, self-proclaimed, intelligent.

2. I pointed out that no self-proclamation was made.

3. You pointed out that intelligence is relative.

4. I failed to see the relevancy.

5. I explained that calling someone stupid is a self-proclamation of intelligence due to the relative nature of intelligence.

Edit: The past tense is to keep consistency.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
This was missing:

0. You accused Serendipity of a low IQ

Originally posted by demonseed

[b]1. You intimated that I was, self-proclaimed, intelligent.

2. I pointed out that no self-proclamation was made.

3. You pointed out that intelligence is relative.

4. I failed to see the relevancy.

5. I explained that calling someone stupi ...[text shortened]... ence due to the relative nature of intelligence.

Edit: The past tense is to keep consistency.[/b]
Sorry can't agree, matey.

Nice try though.

My comment about Serendipity's IQ which implied that I was more intelligent need
not imply that I was intelligent in an absolute sense anymore than someone having
the intelligence of a semi-cognisant traffic cone can claim to be Voltaire.

Actually, my post was in reference to one post which I felt was indicative of
an underlying mental deficiency and since it is called a 'sarcasm' thread' I feel
I have artistic license to be brutal.

I hope this clears things up for you better than the penicillin.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by demonseed
Sorry can't agree, matey.

Nice try though.

My comment about Serendipity's IQ which implied that I was more intelligent need
not imply that I was intelligent in an absolute sense anymore than someone having
the intelligence of a semi-cognisant traffic cone can claim to be Voltaire.

Actually, my post was in reference to one post which I felt was ...[text shortened]... tistic license to be brutal.

I hope this clears things up for you better than the penicillin.
Absolute sense of intelligence makes as much sense as intelligence drinking Absolute(TM).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Absolute sense of intelligence makes as much sense as intelligence drinking Absolute(TM).
Yeah, sure... You're soooo right.

Is this the idea?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mosquitorespect
Yeah, sure... You're soooo right.

Is this the idea?
Where is it?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Absolute sense of intelligence makes as much sense as intelligence drinking Absolute(TM).
I suspect you meant Absolut(TM)

... but it's difficult to be absolutely sure about that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Where is it?
... in the absolute sense?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by widget
I suspect you meant [b]Absolut(TM)

... but it's difficult to be absolutely sure about that.[/b]
You are absolutely correct.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by widget
... in the absolute sense?
Do absolute ideas make sense?