Go back
Spring Theory

Spring Theory

General


@shallow-blue said
No, it wouldn't. An oscillating system within a greater one would - entropy, and all. But an oscillating universe would have nowhere to lose entropy nor energy to, and would therefore continue to spring back and forth eternally.
You might want to take that up with moonbus. He said "Each rebound would be less energetic than the previous one".


Oscillating Universe

1. Are we talking about a universe that goes all the way back to a big crunch, then starts over with another big bang? And this process repeats over and over again.
2. Or are we talking about a variation of this theory that says the universe stops short of reaching the crunch point and bounces back into expanding?

I assumed we were talking about the second one.


@Kilroy70

That you can type at all despite the cosmic oscillations is to a meager extent impressive.



-Removed-
Keep your hands out of my crotch unless you want them chopped off.



-Removed-
It's never as funny if you have to explain it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kilroy70 said
Oscillating Universe

1. Are we talking about a universe that goes all the way back to a big crunch, then starts over with another big bang? And this process repeats over and over again.
2. Or are we talking about a variation of this theory that says the universe stops short of reaching the crunch point and bounces back into expanding?

I assumed we were talking about the second one.
Do you have a gearshift knob made from a human bone?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@gambrel said
Do you have a gearshift knob made from a human bone?
I refuse to answer on the grounds, the grounds that, uh
Oh, you know the thing.


@kevin-eleven said
Keep your hands out of my crotch unless you want them chopped off.
Sometimes I think that the only people still posting here are at least somewhat mentally ill. You may hold the number one ranking, however.

1 edit

Anyway, in a meager attempt to stop the unraveling, I confess to having an ulterior motive for proposing bouncy springs over vibrating strings.
I can't yet prove this, but I believe in the quantum realm there exist uber-tiny sentient beings who at this very moment are arguing among themselves over the proposed existence of macro sentient beings engaged in examining the micro quantum realm which theoretically (but undoubtedly) could be occupied by very small sentient forms of life.
If they exist in two dimensional form then perhaps strings, which appear to occupy 3 dimensions but in reality only occupy 2, could be the key to bridging the gap making it possible to set up lines of communication.

I call this the "Horton hears a Who" effect.


@kilroy70 said
Anyway, in a meager attempt to stop the unraveling, I confess to having an ulterior motive for proposing bouncy springs over vibrating strings.
I can't yet prove this, but I believe in the quantum realm there exist uber-tiny sentient beings who at this very moment are arguing among themselves over the proposed existence of macro sentient beings engaged in examining the micr ...[text shortened]... making it possible to set up lines of communication.

I call this the "Horton hears a Who" effect.
Correction, I meant to say:

If they (the life forms) exist in two dimensional form then perhaps springs (not strings)

precision is very important


@kevin-eleven said
@Kilroy70

That you can type at all despite the cosmic oscillations is to a meager extent impressive.
That I'm able to type with one finger on a tiny pop up keyboard is also to a meager extent impressive.


@bigdogg said
Sometimes I think that the only people still posting here are at least somewhat mentally ill. You may hold the number one ranking, however.
approximately


@badradger said
we need to link your spring theory to my big bag theory
I agree. The universe can be described as a big stretchy bag of stuff (chips) expanding until counter balancing forces prevent any further expansion.
After that it's a crap shoot as to whether the bag begins to deflate or is held in place with cosmic twist ties.