@fmf saidIf you were capable of making accurate assessments and thereby touching nerves or making people wince, shouldn't your moral compass guide you toward exercising self-restraint?
Obviously, my accurate assessment of your intelligence as it manifests itself here on this message board has touched a nerve. Which bits of it in particular made you wince?
@kevin-eleven saidDuchess64 offered what she claims was an "accurate assessment" of Suzianne's intelligence. And I offered an "accurate assessment" of Duchess64's, as I see it manifesting itself on this message board.
If you were capable of making accurate assessments and thereby touching nerves or making people wince, shouldn't your moral compass guide you toward exercising self-restraint?
"Self-restraint" would have precluded the subsequent conversation in which Duchess64's behaviour substantiated much of what I said in my assessment.
There has been no moral issue for my moral compass to process on this thread.
@fmf saidOh, the unmitigated irony.
Regardless of what my own degree of intelligence may or may not be, I offer this accurate assessment of your performance in conversations on these message boards:
Whatever intellectual capacity you may have away from here, I don't think it exhibits itself well in exchanges on this website.
You rely very heavily on logical fallacies and weasel words to cause deliberate misu ...[text shortened]... nt enough to make these observations about you.
I hope you appreciate my insights and my candour.