The relief after sex

Originally posted by Pawn Qween
So how many partners do you have to have to make you good? Is it the same number for women as it is men?

As long as you get off, you're good.

Originally posted by JohnLennonForever
LOL Here's how I look at it, I'm 19 years old and I've made it this far easily without sex, so why not wait till marriage. It's just frustrating when people consider it a bad thing, it shows how immoral our society is.

In my experience marriage signals the end of a great sex life not the beginning!

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
As long as you get off, you're good.

In that case, two virgins are good, blowing Starrman's theory. And what is so wrong with a 19 year old guy being a virgin? I say well done him and good luck.

Originally posted by Pawn Qween
In that case, two virgins are good, blowing Stocken's theory. And what is so wrong with a 19 year old guy being a virgin? I say well done him and good luck.

That's not the issue, the issue is sex only after marriage, being a virgin at 19 is neither here nor there.

Originally posted by Pawn Qween
In that case, two virgins are good, blowing Stocken's theory. And what is so wrong with a 19 year old guy being a virgin? I say well done him and good luck.

I don't recall ever saying there was anything wrong with it, I'm just challenging his beliefs and perception of what is moral.

Originally posted by Starrman
That's not the issue, the issue is sex only after marriage, being a virgin at 19 is neither here nor there.

What does it matter when somebody has sex? If somebody wants to wait then that is good for them. Most religions do not encourage sex outside of marriage.

Originally posted by Pawn Qween
What does it matter when somebody has sex? If somebody wants to wait then that is good for them. Most religions do not encourage sex outside of marriage.

Ack, are you paying attention at all? Johnthomasforever thinks it is amoral to have sex outside of marriage, we're pursuing that. It's not about what age you have sex at, nor whether they themselves wish to wait (although it seems ridiculous to me that you wouldn't want to know the person you;re about to spend the rest of your life together intimately). It's about saying that others are wrong to have sex outside of marriage and get on your high horse for abstaining on the grounds of morality. Do try and keep up...

Originally posted by JohnLennonForever
LOL Here's how I look at it, I'm 19 years old and I've made it this far easily without sex, so why not wait till marriage. It's just frustrating when people consider it a bad thing, it shows how immoral our society is.

What a load of crap. That some religions consider such a beautiful thing as immoral just shows how much they've lost the plot.

Originally posted by Starrman
Ack, are you paying attention at all? Johnthomasforever thinks it is amoral to have sex outside of marriage, we're pursuing that. It's not about what age you have sex at, nor whether they themselves wish to wait (although it seems ridiculous to me that you wouldn't want to know the person you;re about to spend the rest of your life together intimately). ...[text shortened]... and get on your high horse for abstaining on the grounds of morality. Do try and keep up...

I have kept up thanks, and the word I read was immoral - not amoral as you say, so who was paying attention? lol 😛

And as the rest of my post said, his opinion is a common belief in many religions.
I'm not bothered about him saying it's immoral, even though it would mean that I am!
😉🙂

Originally posted by eddiedean
Lord, nooooooo!

Keep your head down Eddie . . . NO, NO, keep your head UP!

Originally posted by stocken
So, the frustration is not the effect of your beliefs and choices being
questioned, but because you have the notion in your head that (because of
your choice here) you're morally superior to the rest of us, and we therefore
shouldn't speak with you as if you are our equal? Interesting. 🙂

I don't care what you believe, I don't think I'm better than any of you. I don't care what you think of me, if I didn't treat you as equals, I would be saying stuff like shut the f*** up, but I"m not. You have your beleifs and I respect that but in my opinion those beliefs are immoral.

Originally posted by Palynka
What a load of crap. That some religions consider such a beautiful thing as immoral just shows how much they've lost the plot.

The whole purpose of sex is reproduction, not personal pleasure. That is where the beauty in sex lies, and that is why it is considered immoral to have sex outside of marriage.

Originally posted by JohnLennonForever
I don't care what you believe, I don't think I'm better than any of you. I don't care what you think of me, if I didn't treat you as equals, I would be saying stuff like shut the f*** up, but I"m not. You have your beleifs and I respect that but in my opinion those beliefs are immoral.

Requesting that you explain your beliefs and moral position is not unreasonable.

Originally posted by JohnLennonForever
The whole purpose of sex is reproduction, not personal pleasure. That is where the beauty in sex lies, and that is why it is considered immoral to have sex outside of marriage.

You, pretty much like the religions I've mentioned, reduce an action (i.e. sex) to its basic physiological function. Pathetic.

The typical cognitive dissonance, considering that the whole point of religion is to give us some sort of purpose beyond physical pleasures. But consistence isn't your forte, is it?

Originally posted by JohnLennonForever
The whole purpose of sex is reproduction, not personal pleasure. That is where the beauty in sex lies, and that is why it is considered immoral to have sex outside of marriage.

The average woman bears 1.9 children.

Does this mean she should aspire to 1.9 sexual experiences?