Originally posted by KewpieWell said. Although I'd say it's a chowder we are in and not a soup.
A post which on the surface is a civil thank-you, but the sting "you've decided ..." is a direct statement that divegeester is a problem. Then there's the suggestion that the poster is organising a solution project and divegeester has joined that project.
I didn't read a civil thank-you. I read a combination of self-aggrandisement and attack on another po ...[text shortened]... Forum is not a place for anyone to claim the moral high ground. We're all in the soup together.
1 edit
Originally posted by KewpieNOTE TO THE FORUM'S CHRONOLOGIST #todo #priority
I didn't read a civil thank-you. I read a combination of self-aggrandisement and attack on another poster.
Please enter this definition in the annals of Red Hot Pawn, next to Blob's name,
right after the psychiatrist's diagnose.
Pure Gold™
Originally posted by Great Big SteesOK, then. Wycombe Al posted twice on just this thread alone in the space of 56 minutes. That's 1 post every 28 minutes for that sampled period of time. And it doesn't factor in his posting on other threads. Use these statistics as you see fit.
I'm sure someone might do some digging and come up with a kind of statistical (objective) bent on the thread's topic.
Originally posted by Very RustyWe had a childhood saying in our family "I sit down corrected" because we were so rarely standing when we said it. Whenever I see or hear "I stand corrected" I automatically restate it in my head.
I've always said: "I stand corrected", when I happen to be wrong about something.
In this case though I was sitting when I typed it, so perhaps standing corrected would be wrong also. 😉
-VR
Anyone else have a similar mental process about a catchphrase?