Go back
These 12 steps.

These 12 steps.

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
Do not harass other members of the community. Harassment is any unwanted conduct including insults, jokes and any remarks affecting the dignity of another. Such conduct could relate to "gender".

-------------------------------

Fix'd!~
Let us listen to the wise words of a "Man In Mourning"


Wut exclamation mark?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
I know I am, but what are you?
Aye, no, I am, buttwad, are you?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Guys, don't 'argue' with the mentally handicapped. Really, it just gives you a headache.

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
The 3 other Posters, do not know the answer to my question, perhaps you don't either, and if that is the case, all you had to do is say so.

Again thank you kindly for avoiding the answer, to the question I was asking. Oh, and I have managed to get my Clan Chess game moves all made at the same time....LOL...

You are the KING of avoiding answering a direct question, nice job!

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Crowley
Guys, don't 'argue' with the mentally handicapped. Really, it just gives you a headache.
Who would you be refering to Crowley?

I think that is rather a RUDE statement to make.

Do you not understand that the 12 steps was being discussed? Not actualy an agrument, but a discussion. 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Who would you be refering to Crowley?

I think that is rather a RUDE statement to make.
Would you argue to the contrary: that it is worthwhile to engage the mentally handicapped in debate?

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Same as it was in the beginning, what other words, besides "idiot" would be a no no?

We have come full circle now.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
My guess is that the question is why 'idiot' is the chosen word in the first step of the twelve steps.

Inserting 'For example' before 'calling someone "idiot"' would have made things clearer.


Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Would you argue to the contrary: that it is worthwhile to engage the mentally handicapped in debate?
Do you see a mentally handicapped person here in the discussion?

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Are you putting on a show for your friends, because I am not impressed?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Same as it was in the beginning, what other words, besides "idiot" would be a no no?

We have come full circle now.
Something clearly calculated to cause offence. Even an idiot would realize that, but some clearly feel obliged to push the limits into Idiot Joy Showland.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
We have come full circle now.
Ah, the majestic plural.