These 12 steps.

Originally posted by Very Rusty
You can't just pick one word out of all the words used, and say that is the one, that is a joke.

Either get rid of all of them, or none!

Do you understand the concept of "example"?

Originally posted by Palynka
Do you understand the concept of "example"?

I do, do you understand the concept of contribution?

All I said is that more words should be added into that list...What exactly is wrong in that?

All it takes is a yes they should, or no they shouldn't!

Not a difficult concept to understand is it?

Originally posted by Very Rusty
I do, do you understand the concept of contribution?

All I said is that more words should be added into that list...What exactly is wrong in that?

All it takes is a yes they should, or no they shouldn't!

Not a difficult concept to understand is it?

Only one example should suffice in getting the point across. How many do you need?

Originally posted by lausey
Only one example should suffice in getting the point across. How many do you need?

It appeared to me that by setting up the question answer thing, CFT was looking for a discussion on it. Did it not appear that way to you?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

And you are not?

Calling names is always childish, no matter who does it.

Do you undestand that?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

You don't want to contribute anything you just want to throw potshots at me. Does that make you feel like you have accomplished something?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

The guidelines are actually not bad, I was impressed with them.

Have you read them, and noticed how many times you have been out of line?

You never make a valid point throwing potshots at someone EVER!

Originally posted by Very Rusty
I do, do you understand the concept of contribution?

All I said is that more words should be added into that list...What exactly is wrong in that?

All it takes is a yes they should, or no they shouldn't!

Not a difficult concept to understand is it?

I guess you don't.

Originally posted by Palynka
I guess you don't.

Why do you think CFT set up the question answer thing, it was so it could be discussed, was it not?

Originally posted by Very Rusty
It appeared to me that by setting up the question answer thing, CFT was looking for a discussion on it. Did it not appear that way to you?

You started by asking a very daft question, expecting a very exhaustive list of profanities, when the guidelines (as pointed out correctly by CFT) gave a good example of an ad hominem attack. It isn't the actual word "idiot" that is in question, it is the context of how it is used.

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Why do you think CFT set up the question answer thing, it was so it could be discussed, was it not?

I don't know, but that's not very relevant. Even if he didn't, discussing it is a natural extension of his comments. I have nothing against discussing them.

Please answer this: Isn't the point of examples NOT having to go through an extensive list?

Originally posted by lausey
You started by asking a very daft question, expecting a very exhaustive list of profanities, when the guidelines (as pointed out correctly by CFT) gave a good example of an ad hominem attack. It isn't the actual word "idiot" that is in question, it is the context of how it is used.

Calling another poster an "idiot" will leave a post subject to immediate removal.

The aforementioned does not say anything about any other words, just "idiot", there is no reason to believe that other words would be added is there?