Originally posted by CrazyLilTingGreat idea J.
What about recs being non cumulative? That is, being reset to 0 every, say, 30 days? It'd stop the stupid race to get them. And the rec system should mantain its functionality.
Of course, I'm referring only to the individual record of rec's.
So, any post in the last 7 (or maybe more) will retain the correct number of recs it deserved in that period.
Only a non-elaborated idea.
- J
2 edits
Originally posted by CrazyLilTingI think that would make matters worse. As already suggested.
What about recs being non cumulative? That is, being reset to 0 every, say, 30 days? It'd stop the stupid race to get them. And the rec system should mantain its functionality.
Of course, I'm referring only to the individual record of rec's.
So, any post in the last 7 (or maybe more) will retain the correct number of recs it deserved in that period.
Only a non-elaborated idea.
- J
Originally posted by PocketKingsThen quit crying!
The more i think about it the more I don't like this. Seriously, this is giving in to all the babies who cried and cried. There are good, solid posting members who lost a crap load of earned recs. And for what? For all the idiots who couldn't stand it that someone had a higher number next to their name, or that someone had more friends here then they did. I guess crying to get what you want works sometimes
Originally posted by CrazyLilTingI know it isn't strictly relevant, and please don't take this the wrong way, but why have you never subscribed?
What about recs being non cumulative? That is, being reset to 0 every, say, 30 days? It'd stop the stupid race to get them. And the rec system should mantain its functionality.
Of course, I'm referring only to the individual record of rec's.
So, any post in the last 7 (or maybe more) will retain the correct number of recs it deserved in that period.
Only a non-elaborated idea.
- J
You seem to invest a lot in the site - except money!