Originally posted by Grampy Bobby This one sentence was in reply to the original post [not intended as a personalized statement to you or anyone else].
Why did you copy paste this particular post of your own again and include it in a response addressed to divegeester?
edit: You've posted exactly the same text four or five times in only four pages of this thread.
Originally posted by divegeester So you included it in your reply to me, but it has no bearing on your reply to me and no bearing on me personally?
Since my page one reply to the original post was quoted with your question, the purpose here was to replicate its page one stand alone format disassociated from you or anyone else to underscore and reinforce my reply to you now on page five.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby Since my page one reply to the original post was quoted with your question, the purpose here was to replicate its page one stand alone format disassociated from you or anyone else to underscore and reinforce my reply to you now on page five.
How is posting it in a reply to me "disassociating it" from me?
It seems to me that this is another classic example of you pouring treacle in one of my ears while jabbing me in the kidneys.
Do you ever wonder why you have alienated yourself from so many people here...?
Originally posted by divegeester How is posting it in a reply to me "disassociating it" from me?
It seems to me that this is another classic example of you pouring treacle in one of my ears while jabbing me in the kidneys.
Do you ever wonder why you have alienated yourself from so many people here...?
Topic of this thread is "What is 'hate'?" (One of three threads on the same topic currently on page one of this forum). I've gained several insights while contributing a few thoughts of my own. You've kept your replies and questions objective and on topic for awhile before an unfortunate segue into personalized off topic detours [focused on divegeester and/or gb]. Identical patterns of gradual retrogression from thread topics to subjective confrontation have also frequently occurred in this site's spirituality forum. If the conversation regains its original post tone of objectivity, my interest in participating may return.
'Love and hate have a magical transforming power. They are the great soul changers. We grow through their exercise into the likeness of what we contemplate.'
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby Topic of this thread is "What is 'hate'?" (One of three threads on the same topic currently on page one of this forum). I've gained several insights while contributing a few thoughts of my own. You've kept your replies and questions objective and on topic for awhile before an unfortunate segue into personalized off topic detours [focused on diveg ...[text shortened]... ersation regains its original post tone of objectivity, my interest in participating may return.
Just calling it as I see it, if you don't want to attract negative attention then don't post negative stuff at people.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby Identical patterns of gradual retrogression from thread topics to subjective confrontation have also frequently occurred in this site's spirituality forum.
This is a bit rich coming from you. No one has started as many threads on the Spirituality Forum in order to dish out pompous contemptuous remarks about posters you don't like or disagree with as you have. A couple of months ago, you even came right out and admitted that you were trolling the Spirituality Forum.
08 Apr '15 06:561 edit
What is "hate"?
Back to Top