Yeah, madness, you're perfectly balanced and capable in your relationships. My mistake.
Who the heck are you? What could you possibly ever know about any relationships I have or have not had? More a reflection of your own self I think. Your reality is not mine. I still have a deep respect for and wonderfull friendships with my ex's. Exception being.....1 idiot.
I've lost count of the number of times you've inferred that men are all useless. Perhaps you should read what you post sometimes.
Bit sensetive are we? Are you in fact useless? If not then what's the problem. I suppose I've never read posts by numerous male members on this site who refer to women as much worse than useless. But that's not quite the same somehow is it? Suck it up princess...it's called a joke.
For the record...I do not believe men to be useless, evil, cruel, blah blah blah. But I do stand by creepy. That I will state as absolutle fact.
REad my posts? LMAO! You seem to be the only one reading my posts. I sure as heck don't read them. So why do you keep bothering?
You keep telling yourself that your staying single is by choice, hope it works out for you.
So you in all your great wisdom think that it's completely normal, healthy and acceptable behaviour for a women with children to jump right into a new relationship do you? That would be the better choice? And yes by choice I have put myself and my children first. So crucify me.
By yourself? Wonders will never cease. You mean you actually turn yourself on? Weird...
Yes...I can turn myself on, very easily as matter of fact. Without the aid of porn and lapdancers and the such. I've even had orgasms while having sex. Imagine that! I guess orgasm is a very serious word and should never be joked about. Especially when coming from a woman. Weather I have, had or am having orgasms isn't really the point is it. I'm not the one who started the orgasm thread. So why you feel the need to lash out at me for posting in it is just without reason.
This doesn't even make sense; how does it link to the previous sentence?
You always fall back to that in your arguements.......So let me explain...The sense in it was...that I am capable of having an orgasm as well as capable of having a laugh about such things as orgasms. If you fail to see the humour in what I'm saying that's fine. But why you need to take it so seriously is beyond me. Lighten up.
Ladies and gentlemen, the victim is in the building.
I love how you throw that word about. What exactly constitutes a victum in your mind anyways? Because I know what I define a victum as. I wouldn't ever consider myself such.
1) Closed minded and judgemental are not necessarily linked.
No they're not. But you exceed both of them so well and all at once.
2) I'm not closed minded.
So closed minded in fact you refuse to open your mind to the possibility that you're being closed minded at all.
3) What can I say? You just bring out the best in me.
I've been known to have this effect on certain men. The kind that feel the need to constantly try to put me in my place. Whatever the heck that is! Your gripes are nothing more than disgruntled ramblings against whatever persona you have chosen to put upon me.
You're transparent, stop hiding your fears behind counter-productive self-justifications and you might just start whinging a little less; good for everyone, no?
Hmmm....what fears would those be doctor? The fears of some a-hole nobody on a chess forum dissaproving of me? Who constantly tries to intimidate me with his insults and hatefull remarks against anything I post? Who pretends to know who he's talking to? Are those the fears you're referring to? I don't need to justify anything to anyone in my life....least of all here on a freaking chess forum. What is it you feel the need to accomplish with your holier than thou attitude? Satisfying a desperate need to feel somehow superior?
Should I pass the crack....errr peace pipe along now?
Originally posted by catfoodtimYou need to read above post. I stand by the creepy thing.
Thread 45879
Originally posted by mokkovictim, with an "i".
victum
And I do believe he was using the word in reference to psychologically being a victim rather than the "I got raped in the street"-victim.
Oh, and just out of interest: How would you disrespect yourself and your children by having a relationship Did you know that studies show that it is harmful for children to grow up without male influences/persons of authority?
Somehow I hope your kids will have decent male teachers in school... I know that I personally wouldn't want to be growing up under a selfrighteous, feminist mother...
Originally posted by angie88It's not harmfull for a mother to have a relationship when she has children. Don't take it out of context. It's also not healthy for kids to be continually exposed to many short term relationships either. Not to mention my two oldest girls have a wonderfull father. They don't need any male figures trying to replace him in any way. The relationship we have formed together has parents to our children is the only role model that they need to have. I do however have several male friends who my kids are very accostomed to. So your opinion of my children being sheltered away in some sort of convent setting is just false. They see the respect and love between their father and I. It's all they need.
victim, with an "i".
And I do believe he was using the word in reference to psychologically being a victim rather than the "I got raped in the street"-victim.
Oh, and just out of interest: How would you disrespect yourself and your children by having a relationship Did you know that studies show that it is harmful for children to grow up without ...[text shortened]... that I personally wouldn't want to be growing up under a selfrighteous, feminist mother...
I feel that the worst thing a mother can teach her children about love is that it's expendable and disposable. That's absolutely horrible. I hear what you're saying, but I know that you would not be ok with your father moving out and your "new" daddy moving in.
There are various stages of emotions that are experienced when a seperation happens. To not take time to recognize and heal from these emotions before jumping into a new relationship is just asking for a disaster to repeat itself. Why would any mother put her children, herself or another person through this emotional turmoil.
It's nothing to do with feminist views or otherwise. It has to do with common sense and understanding human behaviours.I would really like to hear from parents who have been through it and not people who only think they know what it's all about.
RE: Spelling. I'm seeing triples right now when I look at my keyboard. So lucky any words are spelled right. AND! NO! Not because I'm drunk or some dunb crap like that. I simply need new contacts.
Originally posted by sasquatch672Why is it other people can refer to you as hot smoking sasquatch meat but I get crucified for such things? :'(
I think the two of you should really get it over with. Hit the sack, grunt grunt, push push, ooooooOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHH!!!! Mokko I think you're smokin' hot. Smokin' hot.
I'm just trying to defend myself for being labelled something I'm not
Just because I try and have a laugh on here or occasionally get into heated conversations. What's so different about when I do it as opposed to anybody else?
And yes...before anybody asks. I'm home alone for a few days. So I'm simply trying to pass the time. 😴 I have lots of time to ask these sorts of things and respond to just about anything. 🙄
Originally posted by angie88would you still think it were harmful if the relationship was an abusive one?..hey as long as there's some male influence. Lots of kids grow up and have healthy relationships and successful lives without having a dad around...I'm sure you don't know enough about Mokkos circumstances to make such a judgmental comment.
victim, with an "i".
And I do believe he was using the word in reference to psychologically being a victim rather than the "I got raped in the street"-victim.
Oh, and just out of interest: How would you disrespect yourself and your children by having a relationship Did you know that studies show that it is harmful for children to grow up without ...[text shortened]... that I personally wouldn't want to be growing up under a selfrighteous, feminist mother...
Originally posted by mokkoErm... He referred to himself as hot smoking meat. The point of my joke was that I'd rather eat him than have sex with him. I find the idea of "hot smoking meat" in a sexual sense absolutely appalling and would never refer to someone in that way.
Why is it other people can refer to you as hot smoking sasquatch meat but I get crucified for such things? :'(
Originally posted by sasquatch672Joking about it to ease your conscience? I'd bet you wouldn't know what's Portuguese even if it hit you in the face.
Well, Mok, that was actually a self-reference...but when you've got it, baby...
I don't know why you get such a hard time. Couple of people have Mokko-bashing as a sport. Bit unfair, as I see it. You & I are mucho simpatico - sorry, very copasetic, boycotting all things Latin/Portuguese at the moment.
Home for a few days, eh? Where's the nea ...[text shortened]... airport? I could sneak up to the Yukon and we could, a-HEM, play a little chess...[b]😉[/b]
Edit: Xenhomophobe.
Originally posted by NordlysThat may well be the case. And only because it was posted by you, as most people here know your personality and you've been very open in being asexual and what it means, which makes it somehow alright. Because it is a completely sexual phrase to everyone else reading it.
Erm... He referred to himself as hot smoking meat. The point of my joke was that I'd rather eat him than have sex with him. I find the idea of "hot smoking meat" in a sexual sense absolutely appalling and would never refer to someone in that way.
If I had wrote that would you have still viewed it to mean I'd rather eat him than have sex with him?
Or would it have the other meaning?