Originally posted by NordlysFair enough. I do take things alot differently when said by one person vs. another. And I guess it also depends on weather it's a male person or female person saying certain things. Just as your post was definatley of a sexual nature when I read it, I didn't take it as such as it was written by you.
If he had written exactly the same thing about you as he wrote about me ("Nordlys = Secret Thinker That Sasquatch672 Is One Smoking Hot Piece Of Man-Meat." ), and you had reacted in exactly the same way as I did, I certainly wouldn't have interpreted it as you agreeing with him. But there are many situations in which I would interpret the same words d ...[text shortened]... ut you can be sure someone will pick up on it if it's possible to interpret it that way.
It seems to me that there are people who feel that I shouldn't have any thoughts, feelings, expressions, opinions or desires in any and all regards to sexuality. While I don't agree I can certainly respect such opinions.
Originally posted by sasquatch672Sex is purely mental, not physical.
You might not find Mokko as your cup of tea personally, man, but really - she's a good-looking girl, and I don't know, given the choice of sex with a good-looking girl or raping oneself with a length of rusty barbed wire - that's a little, uh, gay, man, innit?
Originally posted by sasquatch672Well, but how high is that chance? Now, assume she were a nymphomanical, sex-crazed porn star with more money than she can spend and very liberal views, then let's put the probability at 100%, shall we?
given the choice of sex with a good-looking girl
Now, these points are all as far as I can tell by what is conveyed in her posts.
-she does not seem nymphomanical, rather the opposite.
>> -20%
- She has said that she likes sex with herself better than that with men, so (assuming you are a man)
>> -30%
-as far as I know of, she does not have too much money, so unless you pay her flight ticket
>> -50%
-She does not have very liberal views, so
>> -100%
This leaves us with a probability of roughly - 100% that you will ever end up in bed with her... which means there is double no chance, if you want to put it like that.
Now that we've established that, it leaves you to enjoy the intellect of an online chess acquaintance who might be a 65-year old man having some fun for all you know. Apart from that, this intellect... oh never mind *mental note to shut up* I'll leave it to someone else to continue this line of thought.
Originally posted by duckeggSome people, (I'd hope most people), would never have to understand what it's like dealing with healing your own broken heart while tending to the needs of a childs fragile emotions as well. Life isn't a flipping free for all game of ring around the rosie. People make mistakes, people don't always get what they deserve, the good guys don't always win and love is not always happily ever after. But there are a few things in life that are set in stone.
would you still think it were harmful if the relationship was an abusive one?..hey as long as there's some male influence. Lots of kids grow up and have healthy relationships and successful lives without having a dad around...I'm sure you don't know enough about Mokkos circumstances to make such a judgmental comment.
Not one single human being on the face of this god forsaken planet has ever asked to be here. Not one person ever has made the choice to be here.
Once we get here we all desire nothing more than love. It's the ultimate reason we live, eat, drink, breath whatever. Without this love we fail to thrive.
The type and amount of love we recieve when we first come into this world is the love we will continue to gravitate towards, will give to others, will will carry with us and continue to develop throughout our entire lives.
Each and every new generation that is thrust into this world bares the burdens of every generation before. We will always seek the answers to hurts we haven't even known.
The greater the pain we suffer the more we need to accept and understand love. For our children can't know how to fix what we have boken, what was broken before us, before them. Learn what the pain means and you will teach them how to achieve and give love as it was meant.
Nothing is known, nothing is certain, everything is changable, removable , twistable, subjective, argueable and random in nature.
I don't care who you are, what you know, how you live or what you carry deep inside your soul. We are all searching, all wanting, all dealing with the same emotions.
I want for my children, all children , to heal, not cope. To cope is to continue passing pain onto people who don't ever ask to experience it. Another generation another search for love. We all need to discover how to heal. Coping hasn't fixed anything.
So joke, laugh, vent, insult do whatever the heck you want to. It's all just people coping with the same crap. It has no true meaning in healing.
😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴
Originally posted by mokkoWhat is she whinging on about now?
Some people, (I'd hope most people), would never have to understand what it's like dealing with healing your own broken heart while tending to the needs of a childs fragile emotions as well. Life isn't a flipping free for all game of ring around the rosie. People make mistakes, people don't always get what they deserve, the good guys don't always win and love ...[text shortened]... ith the same crap. It has no true meaning in healing.
😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴
Oh...erm.... I'll get my coat 😉
Originally posted by mokkoApologies for trying to turn this into a serious thread but I had a couple of thoughts reading this post.
It's not harmfull for a mother to have a relationship when she has children. Don't take it out of context. It's also not healthy for kids to be continually exposed to many short term relationships either. Not to mention my two oldest girls have a wonderfull father. They don't need any male figures trying to replace him in any way. The relationship we have form ...[text shortened]... NO! Not because I'm drunk or some dunb crap like that. I simply need new contacts.
Putting it in context, I have a new tenant who I was talking to yesterday. She is forty something and her daughter is fifteen. Her daughter has a great relationship with her father. The mother also gets on well with the father but for various reasons they have not been together now for many years. The mother has not had a man in any serious kind of way since she split with her husband and she said that she didn't feel it would be fair on the daughter. Coming from a "broken" home myself, I could nor help thinking, and I said this, that the mother has to think of herself too. She has to have the things she wants and needs too. The mother having these things can only be good for the daughter regardless of how difficult it may be a first. In some ways, as the daughter start to grow, she'll wonder why her mother is alone which may not be a good thing either.
Now I don't know your own personal circumstances mokko, apart from the fact you became my hero in a previous thread 🙂 so I only put this out for some consideration. Your post suggests that the two options are lots of casual men arriving at the house or a replacement father for your daughters. I think there is a third way which any guy worth being interested in would be happy to consider. A way that takes time, slow introductions and an understanding that he can never replace the father but can replace the person you cared for.
Of course, you can't go out looking for that kind of relationship because they don't arrive like that but I was just concerned that it sounds like you are not open to it any more which i think would be a shame.
Originally posted by angie88Not a nympho...yet. I hear things tend to get a bit haywire in around the 30's.
Well, but how high is that chance? Now, assume she were a nymphomanical, sex-crazed porn star with more money than she can spend and very liberal views, then let's put the probability at 100%, shall we?
Now, these points are all as far as I can tell by what is conveyed in her posts.
-she does not seem nymphomanical, rather the opposite.
>> -20%
- She ...[text shortened]... mind *mental note to shut up* I'll leave it to someone else to continue this line of thought.
I don't recall ever saying I like sex with myself better than a man. Oh he11 I may have Lol....Each has it's pros and cons. I'm currently not enjoying sex with a man so yes with the limited options persented I prefer myself. As do half of the people who post on here when options are limited.
What are you defining as liberal views? As my views are continually being challenged and altered through experience and time I have swung from every extreme there is. Noticing how you excluded women on the above mentioned preferrences.
What's wrong with 65 year old men having fun?