Originally posted by StarrmanI wish there were more options for the answer than "yes" and "no". I'd like to have "it depends" and "I don't know" added.
I guess my understanding of the questions is different to that of the questioner, nothing more.
I came out INTJ (100% I, 50% N, 50% T, 56% J) this time, but I have done a similar (possibly the same) test before with a different result, and I have also tried another Keirsey test, again with a different result. But I always get I and T. Looking at the descriptions, INTP seems to fit best. "Precise about their descriptions, INTPs will often correct others (or be sorely tempted to) if the shade of meaning is a bit off. While annoying to the less concise, this fine discrimination ability gives INTPs so inclined a natural advantage as, for example, grammarians and linguists." 🙄
Your Type is
ENTJ
Extroverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
1 12 1 1
ENTJ type description by D.Keirsey
ENTJ type description by J. Butt
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
slightly expressed extrovert
slightly expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed judging personality
Originally posted by TheSkipperI am an ESFJ as well - would you like to be my life partner? 😳
ESFJ
I am:
very expressed extrovert (78% )
moderately expressed sensing personality (38% )
moderately expressed feeling personality (38% )
slightly expressed judging personality (22% )
It is reasonably accurate for me.
INTJ
* distinctively expressed introvert
* very expressed intuitive personality
* distinctively expressed thinking personality
* slightly expressed judging personality
EDIT They made us do one of these at school; the result was the same, although the questions were completely different. Rather than indicating any sort of validity of this test (although it's qualitatively fairly accurate in my case), I think this just means it's about as scientifically sound as the Wit Scale. It's also funny how alcohol reverses the entire thing perfectly.