Originally posted by demonseedYou have the innate inability to hold an argument and also an inability to keep your dirty little paws off the "Enter" key. There are so many flaws/inconsistencies/myths in there, it's scary. Like for example the pain tollerance thing. It's already been scientifically proven that men have a higher pain tollerance than woman. Also, the illiteracy thing you brought up has also been disproven by our good old friend, science. When they did a study of Canadian elementary school children in grades 1-3, they discovered that the boys had a signifigantly higher illieracy rate than the girls. But these are just two examples of why your argument sucks. If you're going to say something, at least back it up with some logic/science or I'm going to have to beat you with a palm tree as part of plan #861 - Beat people with stuff and have fun doing it. 😉
Of course men are better than women.
Women only have one ability: the ability to have children. Furthermore, the ability to have children is simply a convaluted means of avoiding
having to do work. Yet, this innate ability is held up as proof that a woman has
a higher pain threshold than a man. If men were to have kids rather than women
they would p ...[text shortened]... g called integrity.
As for chess: HA! Their fuzzy little brains can't cope with it.
~The MCP
Hello my knob-headed friend.
I was playing devil's advocate, badly. Yet the best argument you can provide of disproving female illiteracy levels relates to the Canadian school system: most Canadians are illiterate, it's not a good control variable. (Actually, UNESCO and UNICEF confirmed that two out of every three illiterates are women but I wouldn't accept these stats at face value without taking into consideration the socio-political and cultural mores that underpin these figures.)
Actually, I was trying to generate an impassioned defence of the strength of women but since only a few limp-wristed responses could be mustered I am starting to think that maybe men are better after all.
Many a truth spoken in jest.
A pal of mine wrote this last year as part of a toilet seat, up or down debate........
Men and women are eaqual
Men and women, while being EQUAL, are not the SAME, a lot of people confuse the two
as an example, women firefighters, it means there has to be seperate sleeping quarters, toilet/bathroom facilities and the men have to curb their language and modify their conversation. Plus if I were unconcious in a burning building I would want a 16 stone bloke to carry me to safety
The same applies to frontline soldiers. By their very nature women will defend their own to the death, but they are not pre disposed to attacking
I think women are much better communicators, negotiators, teachers, listeners, speakers, and carers than men could ever be, all heads of state should be female
I like men to be masculine and women to be feminine.
I love opening doors, buying flowers, paying for dinner and pretending to be brave and strong, I want to be the man of the house, and I want her permission to say so
I want a woman that has the good grace to pander to my testosterone fueled ego, even though when the chips are down she is probably braver and stronger than me
I don't care why women say and do unfathomable things, it's all part of their fascination
I lift the toilet seat and I put it down again, no questions asked
Originally posted by thetank444I heard that, before video simulations, the percentage of US Army soldiers who were willing to actually shoot the enemy was very low, around 25%.
A pal of mine wrote this last year as part of a toilet seat, up or down debate........
Men and women are eaqual
Men and women, while being EQUAL, are not the SAME, a lot of people confuse the two
as an example, women firefighters, it means there has to be seperate sleeping quarters, toilet/bathroom facilities and the men have to curb their la ...[text shortened]... art of their fascination
I lift the toilet seat and I put it down again, no questions asked
Then, the army introduced "First Person Shooter" type video games and other similar live drills, and the rate climbed up. Having seen my girlfriend delight in picking off unsuspecting enemies with a sniper rifle while playing the X-box video game "Halo", I suspect that aggression and the ability to attack come with good training, regardless of the gender of the trainee.
Originally posted by thetank444Your pal sounds like a perfect man.
A pal of mine wrote this last year as part of a toilet seat, up or down debate........
Men and women are eaqual
Men and women, while being EQUAL, are not the SAME, a lot of people confuse the two
as an example, women firefighters, it means there has to be seperate sleeping quarters, toilet/bathroom facilities and the men have to curb their la ...[text shortened]... art of their fascination
I lift the toilet seat and I put it down again, no questions asked
