Originally posted by Very Rusty robbie,
Strange you always say people are slobbering when you can't find something to say with any substance.
-VR
actually judasjeester has made some assertions that he seems unable or unwilling to substantiate, thats incontrovertible evidence of slobbering, please have some more radish juice Crusty and settle down.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie actually judasjeester has made some assertions that he seems unable or unwilling to substantiate, thats incontrovertible evidence of slobbering, please have some more radish juice Crusty and settle down.
robbie,
Perhaps if you stopped tasting your brews, you would make a hell of a lot more sense than you have of late.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie you want me to reprimand a lady for ungentlemanly behavior? are you in your senses?
What's interesting Robbie is that you decided to chide Suzianne for calling Red badger a dick (which he was) and yet uttered not a word of disapproval to Seitse who, in the very next post, called the Queen a slut. (Page 2).
Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke What's interesting Robbie is that you decided to chide Suzianne for calling Red badger a dick (which he was) and yet uttered not a word of disapproval to Seitse who, in the very next post, called the Queen a slut. (Page 2).
Go on, slobber your way out of that one.
slobber my way out of what? one cannot reprimand every one that utters profanities otherwise ones time would be spent endlessly pursuing cads and bounders all over the Internet. Please try to be more reasonable.
Originally posted by HandyAndy Beneath that thin disguise lies a weak-minded male chauvinist. It's not surprising that you oppose Hillary being elected president.
thin disguise? weak-minded? male chauvinist? well at least you are becoming more imaginative than the usual, 'you're an idiot'. Who knows soon you may even be able to put some constituent parts together and synthesize a reality beyond your own fabricated one. I believe in you Randolf, you can do it. Simply let go of your egocentricities, absorb the ambiance and think deeply.
It is utterly preposterous (Gee, I managed to spell both words dictionaryless and without help of auto spell machine on RHP), that Trump might lose elections only due sex scandal, and of all people just from Hillary, whose husband took part in one of the hugest such scandals in US history.
CNN is extremely biased and propagandistic in favor of Mrs. Clinton, it is like Soviet Stalin media in 1950's...
Originally posted by vandervelde It is utterly preposterous (Gee, I managed to spell both words dictionaryless and without help of auto spell machine on RHP), that Trump might lose elections only due sex scandal, and of all people just from Hillary, whose husband took part in one of the hugest such scandals in US history.
CNN is extremely biased and propagandistic in favor of Mrs. Clinton, it is like Soviet Stalin media in 1950's...
Who will be the next President?
08 Nov '16 19:24
Back to Top