Go back
Why does Great Britain suck?

Why does Great Britain suck?

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

So far in the Olympics:

Germany: 18 medals, population 82.2 million, 1 medal per 4.5 million people
Norway: 16 medals, population 4.5 million, 1 medal per 281,000 people
Austria: 10 medals, population 8.2 million, 1 medal per 820,000 people
Switzerland: 8 medals, population 7.4 million, 1 medal per 925,000 people
Italy: 7 medals, population 57.3 million, 1 medal per 8.19 million people
Sweden: 6 medals, population 8.9 million, 1 medal per 1.48 million people
France: 5 medals, population 59.1 million, 1 medal per 11.82 million people
Finland: 5 medals, population 5.2 million, 1 medal per 1.04 million people

Great Britain: 1 medal, population 58.8 million, 1 medal per 58.8 million people

We see that Great Britain has an abysmal number of medals per capita. Only one medal for a nation with more than 50 million people? I'm sorry, but that stinks. They can't put all the blame on their lack of mountains. Finland doesn't have any mountains but they have 5 medals. They're a temperate country, so they get snow. It's not like Algeria or something. Are we to conclude that the British suck? That conclusion seems inescapable.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
So far in the Olympics:

Germany: 18 medals, population 82.2 million, 1 medal per 4.5 million people
Norway: 16 medals, population 4.5 million, 1 medal per 281,000 people
Austria: 10 medals, population 8.2 million, 1 medal per 820,000 people
Switzerland: 8 medals, population 7.4 million, 1 medal per 925,000 people
Italy: 7 medals, population 57.3 mill ...[text shortened]... or something. Are we to conclude that the British suck? That conclusion seems inescapable.
I don't believe tha the olympics a a true measure of a country's strength. It only goes to prove how fanatical the citizens and their governments are about sports which for the most part I don't really give a rat's ass about.

GV

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nighthawk62
I don't believe tha the olympics a a true measure of a country's strength. It only goes to prove how fanatical the citizens and their governments are about sports which for the most part I don't really give a rat's ass about.

GV
I agree. In fact, I found I was taken aback when I learned that the Italian government awards every Italian gold medal winner with a cash prize (approx. $150,000 US).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
So far in the Olympics:

Germany: 18 medals, population 82.2 million, 1 medal per 4.5 million people
Norway: 16 medals, population 4.5 million, 1 medal per 281,000 people
Austria: 10 medals, population 8.2 million, 1 medal per 820,000 people
Switzerland: 8 medals, population 7.4 million, 1 medal per 925,000 people
Italy: 7 medals, population 57.3 mill ...[text shortened]... or something. Are we to conclude that the British suck? That conclusion seems inescapable.
They have stupider taste in sport than the rest of the world, with the US a close second.

To clarify, American football is far stupider than rest-of-world football, but the degree to which many Brits take their football obsessions can only be compared to the degree to which OCD sufferers take their dusting hobby.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
So far in the Olympics:

Germany: 18 medals, population 82.2 million, 1 medal per 4.5 million people
Norway: 16 medals, population 4.5 million, 1 medal per 281,000 people
Austria: 10 medals, population 8.2 million, 1 medal per 820,000 people
Switzerland: 8 medals, population 7.4 million, 1 medal per 925,000 people
Italy: 7 medals, population 57.3 mill ...[text shortened]... or something. Are we to conclude that the British suck? That conclusion seems inescapable.
The amount of snow we get which can be used for winter sports traning of the highest caliber is not that great.

How many people holiday to the UK for the skiing or snow in general?!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by royalchicken
They have stupider taste in sport than the rest of the world, with the US a close second.

To clarify, American football is far stupider than rest-of-world football, but the degree to which many Brits take their football obsessions can only be compared to the degree to which OCD sufferers take their dusting hobby.
I think the USA win this one hands down, by a clear margin. Don't insult us by even comparing our sporting interests to yours. You really are the world leaders when it comes to playing sports hardly anyone else would touch with a bargepole.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
So far in the Olympics:

Germany: 18 medals, population 82.2 million, 1 medal per 4.5 million people
Norway: 16 medals, population 4.5 million, 1 medal per 281,000 people
Austria: 10 medals, population 8.2 million, 1 medal per 820,000 people
Switzerland: 8 medals, population 7.4 million, 1 medal per 925,000 people
Italy: 7 medals, population 57.3 mill ...[text shortened]... or something. Are we to conclude that the British suck? That conclusion seems inescapable.
How about Japan, they're really kicking ass, ain't they? 126 million people, how many medals?

BANZAI!!!!! BANZAI!!!!! BANZAI!!!!! BANZAI!!!!! BANZAI!!!!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

I thought you were asking a general question. The olympics are far from their biggest concern.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
So far in the Olympics:

Germany: 18 medals, population 82.2 million, 1 medal per 4.5 million people
Norway: 16 medals, population 4.5 million, 1 medal per 281,000 people
Austria: 10 medals, population 8.2 million, 1 medal per 820,000 people
Switzerland: 8 medals, population 7.4 million, 1 medal per 925,000 people
Italy: 7 medals, population 57.3 mill ...[text shortened]... or something. Are we to conclude that the British suck? That conclusion seems inescapable.
How bout that Peggy Fleming? Chick can skate, cant she?

Vote Up
Vote Down

We had about two days when snow actually settled long enough to look like snow here, and that's the North of England which is usually one of the worst areas along with Scotland. Hardly ever enough to ski on or any other winter sports.
Finland has been skiing for thousands of years, we in UK are just starting.

Correct, we are more obsessive with 'football'; probably cos we are the best at it......😉

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Oh we Indians are even better.
1 medal (silver) from more than a billion population.

Actually we improved from 2000 olympics
1 medal (bronze) from a billion population.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by arterioes
Oh we Indians are even better.
1 medal (silver) from more than a billion population.

Actually we improved from 2000 olympics
1 medal (bronze) from a billion population.
I could care less about that. The only "medal" I'm interested in is whether "Billy" can help get my Dell going in the middle of the night.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by c99ux
How about Japan, they're really kicking ass, ain't they? 126 million people, how many medals?

BANZAI!!!!! BANZAI!!!!! BANZAI!!!!! BANZAI!!!!! BANZAI!!!!!
Nobody cares if they get a bronze medal in curling. I've got 186,000 miles on my Camry. I give them the gold for that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Great Britain r00000Lz!!!
Hail, Britannia, Britannia rules the waves!!!!!!!!!!!
God bless the UK.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Hahahahaha!

I read the headline and couldn't help but stop in.

Interesting statistics..