Go back
Wikipedia.

Wikipedia.

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
Yes.
I'll take your word for it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
I'll take your word for it.
I see you believe in yourself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
I'll take your word for it.
so what are the rules on the abejnood haiku?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rubberjaw30
so what are the rules on the abejnood haiku?
I don't know, ask schakuhr.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
I don't know, ask schakuhr.
I thought you were running it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rubberjaw30
I thought you were running it.
You mean the answer isn't on Wiki? OMG !!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Objective claims to factual knowledge are really just democratic consensus, if the world agrees, it's true.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
Objective claims to factual knowledge are really just democratic consensus, if the world agrees, it's true.
Hence my parallel with the bible.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zadadka
An awful lot of folk post references that are made in Wikipedia, as if it were a divine oracle.
I'm not saying it's not, but it [b]is after all the product of some knowledge and (probably) more opinion...if no one counters a Wiki entry, it is accepted by rote (by and large).

Reminds me of something....

Ah, yes, I have it now....

2000 years from now, will we swear upon the Wiki ??[/b]
In wikipedia I trust. 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zadadka
Instead of some anonymous website, how about we just accepted the word of Stocky? Got to Love 'Im.
Yes! In me you should put your trust. 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zadadka
Instead of some anonymous website, how about we just accepted the word of Cartoon. God Love 'Im.
I wouldn't trust a cartoon if my life depended on it. 🙁

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
Objective claims to factual knowledge are really just democratic consensus, if the world agrees, it's true.
Define 'consensus'.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stocken
Yes! In me you should put your trust. 😏
😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

The accuracy of Wikipedia is no less than the web as a whole, and in some ways better. However, now Google searches inevitably turn up Wikipedia (and Amazon), and dozens of sites that are no more than parasites on these two as most of the top 20-30 for most searches.

"So long as opinions are counted, rather than weighed, the better part will be overcome by the greater." John Calvin

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zadadka

Reminds me of something....

Ah, yes, I have it now....

2000 years from now, will we swear upon the Wiki ??
Is that when we live in the wiki wiki wild wild west?