05 Dec '08 08:23>
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveI agree with everything except the word 'wrongly'.
I'm glad you agree the advantage wrongly goes to those who pay for it.
Originally posted by SwissGambitThe big difference is: a longer timebank CAN be an advantage to the person who has it, in the individual games.
Why are those arguments invalid, and yet your vacation argument is? They all seem rather trivial to me. Technically, they all describe 'unfair' conditions, and all directly linked to the privileges that only subs get - I just don't see much evidence that the unfairness is beyond a trivial level.
Originally posted by SwissGambitMore practice is available to everyone.
Yes, and more practice games with a particular opening line also CAN be an advantage in the individual games. Where is the difference?
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveYou're right, its not fair. Tough. Life's like that. I don't think its fair that I and all the other subs have to support the non-subs "right" to play 6 games for free until the end of their days. But Russ is the boss.
Firstly, I have said on numerous occasions that it DOESN'T really bother me personally.
I already do only play people I know, or trust to play by the same rules as myself.
What is amazing to me is how some subscribers seem to believe differing timebanks makes for a fair game. If you can't see how a longer timebank for one player could be an adv ...[text shortened]... turn on/turn off choice at the start of the game, like the option for rated or non rated.
Originally posted by dweezilLet's be clear - you do not support me or any other non-sub. Advertising does.
You're right, its not fair. Tough. Life's like that. I don't think its fair that I and all the other subs have to support the non-subs "right" to play 6 games for free until the end of their days. But Russ is the boss.
Here's another solution I think would work. Let non-subs use the vacation system the same as a sub. Limit a non-subs total games to 100. P ...[text shortened]... ould end the feeling of unfairness that a lot of subs have about supporting the non-subs.
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveBut they can't get more than 6 concurrent games worth of practice unless they play outside of RHP. So much for RHP ensuring 'fairness'.
More practice is available to [b]everyone.
Preparation can give a fair advantage but that occurs before the game.
That's the whole point.
There's no way you can justify it like that. 😲🙄😞[/b]
Originally posted by SwissGambitPractice IS available to ALL. Why would it have to be confined to RHP?
But they can't get more than 6 concurrent games worth of practice unless they play outside of RHP. So much for RHP ensuring 'fairness'.
What does it matter when it occurs? And by what rationale do you deem it a 'fair' advantage?
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveThat's ridiculous.
Anything done whilst the game is being played should be on equal terms.
What happens before the game is irrelevant to fairness in a game.
Surely you can see the difference?
Originally posted by RagnorakSo at last we are getting somewhere; you admit that to get a fair-handed game one has to pay for a subscription. That's exactly what I'm saying too.
If a player feels like they are at a disadvantage, they they have the option to restore equality... subscribe.
Players at RHP always have a fair game option available to them. Some chose not to accept equality by not subbing, some chose to put themseslves at a disadvantage by playing drunk.
D
Originally posted by Dr Strangelovei think you are missing entirely the point of the site.
So at last we are getting somewhere; you admit that to get a fair-handed game one has to pay for a subscription. That's exactly what I'm saying too.
If someone plays whilst drunk, that's their own choice per game. It's an outside influence that isn't forced on them during the games.
And before you say everyone has the choice to subscribe, th ...[text shortened]... games are not played on even terms.
Case proven!
edit: wtf is gestapoesque?
Originally posted by trev33All I'm saying is it's technically not a fair-handed game here. And everyone seems to agree.
i think you are missing entirely the point of the site.
we are all here to play chess for FUN on the internet...this is not OTB chess, there's no clock and there's no money or important tournament at stake.
some people pay to play unlimited games and enjoy the extra features of the site....some don't but still help the site because of the advertisemen ...[text shortened]... ep posting in here saying how unfair the vacation is YOU don't really care about it.